Annotated copy of

" The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"


Source: A Black Muslim Imam from Brooklyn, who believed thoroughly in the authenticity of the book.


My Introduction


The Bible commands that we "separate good from evil". The "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", however, is one of the finest examples of the mixing of good and evil which I have ever seen.

In brief, what it is supposed to be is a secret "Jewish" document which was "accidentally" discovered by "Christians". The document supposedly describes an all-encompassing master plan for an ultra-secret society of 300 Jews to conquer the world, and to reduce the world's non-Jewish inhabitants to the status of cattle, i.e., lower-than-slaves.

Cattle can be worked, even to death. They can be slaughtered and eaten, or slaughtered for no reason whatsoever. They can be tortured, or utilized for "medical experiments". They can even be -- God forbid -- used for sexual purposes. All these things, and more, are supposedly contemplated by these 300 Jews as a fitting destiny, and proper punishment, for all living mortals guilty of the "crime" of not being Jewish.

The essential philosophy, and the belief necessary to carry this out, is summed up in the word "discrimination". This is forbidden by all religions, first and foremost by Judaism, and then by everything which followed from it, as well as everything which developed in parallel to it. "Discrimination" means that there are, for any reason -- or no reason -- people who have more rights than others.

Thus, for example, in every nation and in every age, the rich have always considered themselves to be "elite". When a rich person goes into court, he expects to win. When his adversary is poor, he expects the poor adversary to lose -- not because the poor adversary is "wrong", but because -- right or wrong -- he's poor!

Similarly, there are discriminations based upon race, religion, and physical appearance.

Discrimination, in all its forms, is considered evil by all responsible people. Publicly, that is.

Privately, men have practiced discrimination continually since the expulsion from the Garden of Eden. In all of wretched human history, there has been no community of people, so far, which, erroneously calling itself "us", has not murdered those whom it has been able to classify as "them".

Thus, in every nation -- so far -- "they" (i.e. those outside the community) have been regarded as fit to be killed, robbed, raped and enslaved. Don't pretend that you don't know what I'm talking about, because God knows your thoughts, and He will soon call you to account.

The essential feature of discrimination is that it enables one to define a person who has no rights. "Rights" means those sorts of guarantees which form the substance of the Magna Carta, for example, or of the Bill of Rights of the American Constitution.

If, for any reason at all, some group of people can be construed to have fewer rights, than a door of evil opportunity opens. On your side of the door, law and order prevails, and no life, liberty, or property will be seized without something called "due process of law". But on the other side of the door, especially when it is closed so that we cannot see what's going on there, one will find torture, murder, and every imaginable (and unimaginable) wickedness being hatched out. They're not crimes! The victims are "them", not "us"!

The most common example of this is war. Everyone on the side of the "enemy" is "them", and no number of Geneva Conventions will stop "us" from doing whatever is necessary to defeat them, including murder, mass murder, fraud, deceit, treachery, poison, false diplomacy, espionage, propaganda, and so on.

The "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", if it is to be believed, is a plot by 300 unknown but unspeakably wealthy and powerful Jews, whose purpose is to enslave non-Jewish mankind, and to appoint a maximally evil "King of Zion" to rule over mankind with cruelty and rigor. The methods to be used are all the above methods of war. Most disturbing of these are the shameless proposals for unlimited use of fraud and deceit, which reveal a profound and abiding contempt for all non-Jewish humanity.

How effective is "Protocols"? Very. If you're even marginally normal, then the first time you read it, you'll be horrified. If you happen to be Jewish, then the horror is two-fold. If "Protocols" is, God-forbid, true, then Hitler was right, and the world would surely be better off if you were dead.

Hitler, by the way, was a passionate believer in the authenticity of "Protocols", and it is highly probable that his belief in that single book was the reason for the Holocaust.

If the "Protocols" are false, on the other hand, then the net result is the same for Jews: The rest of the world will desire your blood, albeit without proper cause, or "due process of law". Sooner or later, the world, whether lawfully or not, will get your blood. You are marked for death by this book.

If you are a Christian, then the horror is a single horror. You are "awakened" to the existence of a deadly threat, and you are motivated to take any and all action necessary to destroy it. In practical terms, this means, once again, that Hitler was right, and that the proper thing to do to all Jews is to kill them quickly.

So, is it true? The fact-of-the-matter is that "Protocols" is a skillful mixture of truth and fraud. Everyone who has studied global power knows that there is -- beyond a shadow of a doubt -- a "power elite". This simply cannot be denied.

It also cannot be denied that the power elite discriminates against everybody it perceives to be "beneath" it. Hmmm... that's just about everybody.

The power elite can, and will, imprison or eliminate entirely anybody at all, if it serves the interests of ... the power elite. How far will they go? There are only two limitations:

(1) They must ask themselves: "Will we get caught?" If the "little people" below them learn too much, they will rebel and overthrow the prevailing social structure. This will not change the long-term plan, but it will delay its full implementation.

(2) They must ask themselves: "Will any action by us have long-term consequences which will be deleterious to the world-plan?" The power elitists have been around long enough to know that satisfying their urge for your blood may "feel good" for the moment, but may cause long-term problems, regardless of whether or not a "court of law" can get a conviction against them.

This last consideration creates an appearance of "mercy", where someone they want dead is allowed to live -- not because they acknowledge that anyone but themselves has a "right to life", but because it's in their long-term interests to not kill you.

Who is the power elite? In reality, its numbers change, and its members change. Wealth loves only more wealth, and the wealthy will steal from each other just as readily as they will from you. Therefore, whoever is "on top" today may be on the bottom tomorrow.

The world may be controlled by 300 men, or the number may be 301, or 350, or 400, or 1,000. No one knows the number, and there isn't any way to control it.

The identities of the power elitists are partly known, and partly unknown. The Prince of Wales, for example, is on every list you'll see (and there are many people who study these matters, and prepare speculative lists). But a President of the United States may or may not be on the list.

As is true of most big-money industries, power elitism has a disproportionate number of "Jews". Whether any of them actually have ever read the Torah, or even believe in God for that matter, is anybody's guess. My guess is that few of them are interested in God, Judaism, Torah, or anything in the world except money.

However, there is no list of power elitists which is all Jewish, or even more than 50% Jewish. The world is not short of rich Japanese, for example, and the great majority of top banks in the world are Japanese now. To allege that "Jews" somehow control these banks also, is ludicrous.

Have you ever heard of a rich Arab? Believe me, you don't pump 100,000,000 gallons of oil out of the ground, sell it, and then take orders from Jews.

Are there any rich Christians? Anti-Semites consider the Rockefellers to be "Jews". Why? In the final analysis, it's because the Rockefellers have money, and Anti-Semites consider money itself to be "Jewish". Such lying hypocrites will have an opportunity to read MY PROTOCOL in this Web Site**, which exhorts them to give up money, and to "love their neighbors" as themselves. God said you can't serve two masters. We shall soon see who serves Whom.

The Rockefellers are not Jews. John D. was a Sunday school teacher.

Bill Gates III is not a "Jew".

The truth of the matter is that there is a power elite, it is very cohesive, it is utterly ruthless (limited in its ruthless only by public relations considerations), and it includes a disproportionate number of "Jews".

The NON-truth of the matter is that "300 Jews control the world". Such a thing simply cannot be.

It's also not true that you, if you are a non-Jewish person, are any better. If the Son of Man was deemed worthy to die on the cross, what value do you have? None whatsoever.

That's enough of an "introduction". Now let us proceed to the document itself. Get ready.


NOTE: My annotations are all preceded by the bold-faced word "COMMENT:".

Furthermore, my COMMENTS shall be in blue text, so that all confusion about "who said what" can be avoided.

All other text is verbatim from the "original" Protocols; that is, from the text of "Victor E. Marsden", whoever that was (or wasn't - it seems highly probably that this was a pseudonym for an author whose identity we shall probably never know).








The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion


Translated by



The author of this translation of the famous Protocols was himself a victim of the Revolution. He had lived for many years in Russia and was married to a Russian lady. Among his other activities in Russia he had been for a number of years Russian Correspondent of the Morning Post, a position which he occupied when the Revolution broke out, and his vivid descriptions of events in Russia will still be in the recollection of many of the readers of that Journal. Naturally he was singled out for the anger of the Soviet. On the day that Captain Cromie was murdered by Jews, Victor Marsden was arrested and thrown in to the Peter-Paul Prison, expecting every day to have his name called out for execution. This, however, he escaped, and eventually he was allowed to return to England very much of a wreck in bodily health. However, he recovered under treatment and the devoted care of his wife and friends. One of the first things he undertook as soon as he was able was this translation of the Protocols. Mr. Marsden was eminently well qualified for the work. His intimate acquaintance with Russia, Russian life and the Russian language on the one hand, and his mastery of a terse literary English style on the other, placed him in a position of advantage which few others could claim. The consequence is that we have in his version an eminently readable work, and though the subject-matter is somewhat formless, Mr. Marsden's literary touch reveals the thread running through the twenty-four Protocols.

Mr. Marsden's connection with the Morning Post was not severed by his return to England, and he was well enough to accept the post of special correspondent of that journal in the suite of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales on his Empire tour. From this he returned with the Prince, apparently in much better health, but within a few days of his landing he was taken suddenly ill, and died after a very brief illness.

May this work be his crowning monument! In it he has performed an immense service to the English-speaking world, and there can be little doubt that it will take its place in the first rank of the English versions of "THE PROTOCOLS of the Meetings of the LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION."



Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was published by Sergyei Nilus in Russia in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Sovietland was crime sufficient to ensure the owner's being shot on sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.

Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York World, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:

The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW.

Indeed they do!

The word "Protocol" signifies a precis gummed on to the front of a document, a draft of a document, minutes of proceedings. In this instance, "Protocol" means minutes of the proceedings of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. These Protocols give the substance of addresses delivered to the innermost circle of the Rulers of Zion. They reveal the concerted plan of action of the Jewish Nation developed through the ages and edited by the Elders themselves up to date. Parts and summaries of the plan have been published from time to time during the centuries as the secrets of the Elders have leaked out. The claim of the Jews that the Protocols are forgeries is in itself an admission of their genuineness, for they never attempt to answer the facts corresponding to the threats which the Protocols contain, and, indeed, the correspondence between prophecy and fulfillment is too glaring to be set aside or obscured. This the Jews well know and therefore evade.

The presumption is strong that the Protocols were issued, or reissued, at the First Zionist Congress held at Basle in 1897 under the presidency of the Father of Modern Zionism, the late Theodore Herzl.

There has been recently published a volume of Herzl's "Diaries," a translation of some passages which appeared in the Jewish Chronicle of July 14, 1922. Herzl gives an account of his first visit to England in 1895, and his conversation with Colonel Goldsmid, a Jew brought up as a Christian, an officer in the English Army, and at heart a Jew Nationalist all the time. Goldsmid suggested to Herzl that the best way of expropriating the English aristocracy and so destroying their power to protect the people of England against Jew domination, was to put excessive taxes on the land. Herzl thought this an excellent idea, and it is now to be found definitely embodied in Protocol VI!

The above extract from Herzl's Diary is an extremely significant bit of evidence bearing on the existence of the Jew World Plot and authenticity of the Protocols, but any reader of intelligence will be able from his own knowledge of recent history and from his own experience to confirm the genuineness of every line of them, and it is is in the light of this living comment that all readers are invited to study Mr. Marsden's translation of this terribly inhuman document.

And here is another very significant circumstance. The present successor of Herzl as leader of the Zionist movement, Dr. Weizmann, quoted one of these sayings at the send-off banquet given to Chief Rabbi Hertz on October 6, 1920. The Chief Rabbi was on the point of leaving for his Empire tour -- a sort of Jewish answer to the Empire tour of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales. And this is the "saying" of the Sages which Dr. Weizmann quoted: "A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world." (Jewish Guardian, Oct. 8, 1920).

Now compare this with the last clause but one of Protocol XI.

"God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world."

The remarkable correspondence between these passages proves several things. It proves that the Learned Elders exist. It proves that Dr. Weizmann knows all about them. It proves that the desire for a "National Home" in Palestine is only camouflage and an infinitesimal part of the Jew's real object. It proves that the Jews of the world have no intention of settling in Palestine or any separate country, and that their annual prayer that they may all meet "Next Year in Jerusalem" is merely a piece of their characteristic make-believe. It also demonstrates that the Jews are now a world menace, and that the Aryan races will have to domicile them permanently out of Europe.

Who are the Elders?

This is a secret which has not been revealed. They are the Hidden hand. They are not the "Board of Deputies" (the Jewish Parliament in England) or the "Universal Israelit Alliance" which sits in Paris. But the late Walter Rathenau of the Allgemeiner Electricitaets Gesellschaft has thrown a little light on the subject and doubtless he was in possession of their names, being, in all likelihood, one of the chief leaders himself. Writing in the Wiener Freie Presse, December 24, 1912, he said:

Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage.

In the year 1844, on the eve of the Jewish Revolution of 1848, Benjamin Disraeli, whose real name was Israel, and who was a "damped" or baptised Jew, published his novel, Coningsby, in which occurs this ominous passage:

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

And he went on to show that these personages were all Jews.

Now that Providence has brought to the light of day these secret Protocols all men may clearly see the hidden personages specified by Disraeli at work "behind the scenes" of all the Governments. This revelation entails on all white peoples the grave responsibility of examining and revising au fond their attitude towards the Race and Nation which boasts of its survival over all Empires.



I will not attempt to comment on every ignorant and logically absurd saying of "Marsden", or whoever it was who wrote this Introduction. But a few things must be pointed out.

The authorship of the Protocols is generally attributed to Nilus, but the motive behind the book is not likely the motive given by Marsden. In the first place, Nilus is not likely to have been the original author. He apparently plagiarized it from a satire written in 1864 by Maurice Joly, a member of the Rose Croix order of Freemasonry. The satire was not anti-Semitic. Although it had all the paranoid and paranoia-provoking ideation of Protocols, the "enemy" in Joly's book was Napoleon.

Joly was probably not the real author either, since there are older works known which are claimed, by one historian or another, to have been role models for "Protocols". In all probability, the idea of slandering people, by presenting their less-than-admirable characteristics in the worst possible light, is age-old. None of us are "clean", and none of our thoughts -- if they could be publicized -- would stand up favorably to scrutiny.

Nilus was clearly a raving anti-Semite, which doesn't distinguish him from a lot of other people. However, Protocols cannot be understood from that alone. It needs to be considered in the context of the setting in which it first appeared in its current form, namely Russia, on the eve of the Russian Revolution.

The last Czar of Russia was Nicholas II. He was a notoriously inept and ineffectual leader. He was, for all intents and purposes, ruled over by his wife Alexandra.

Alexandra, in turn, was ruled over by others. Both Nicholas and Alexandra shared an affinity for the occult, and they allowed their Court to fall under the influence of occultists. The most famous of these was Rasputin, the "Mad Monk". Rasputin was a sexual pervert and political revolutionary. To the Czar and his wife, Rasputin and his associates represented entertainment. To the rest of the Russian nobility, however, terrified by the revolutionary ideas and events taking place all around them, Rasputin represented death.

The occultists in the Russian Court had strong ties to Masonry, especially French Masonry. Now, the power of Masonry is not to be denied. About half of American Presidents were Masons, and many lines of evidence** show the enormous power of Masonry in America to this day. The French Revolution was also profoundly Masonic.

Although it was the French Queen, Marie Antoinette, who said "let them eat cake" when she was informed that the people had no bread, the historians have made due note of the fact that the discrepancy between rich and poor was substantially greater in early 20th century Russia than in France before her Revolution. Russia was ripe for a Masonic overthrow patterned after the French Revolution, but the power of the aristocracy and the weakness of the peasantry in Russia was great, delaying the Russian Revolution for a century.

By the dawn of the 20th century, however, the end was clearly nigh. It became painfully obvious to the nobility that their power was about to be usurped, however Nicholas and Alexandra seemed neither to know, nor to care. Emergency action was necessary, if disaster was to be averted.

Sergyei Nilus, a minor noble with ties to the court, came to recognize the nature and scope of Freemasonic world activity, and decided to do whatever he could to prevent it from prevailing in Russia. But, through Rasputin, the Freemasons were already established in the Czar's court. How was he to persuade the Czar to remove these trouble-makers?

Alexandra, who made most of the decisions, was firmly under the sway of Rasputin. She had to be shown the danger she was in. But how? Nilus hit upon a rather clever plan. Since Nicholas and Alexandra obviously had no deep-seated fear or hatred of French Freemasonry, Nilus attempted to link the world democracy movement, which threatened the very lives of the nobility, to a group which everyone hated and despised: the Jews.

He approached the Czar with copies of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion". Somewhat to his credit, Czar Nicholas was not fooled by Nilus' pamphlet. He declared it a fraud, banished Nilus from the Court, and had all available copies burned. Too bad for the Czar! Shortly after burning the pamphlets, the Russian Revolution materialized. Nicholas, and his ancestral way of life, were utterly destroyed.

As for the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", it quickly materialized elsewhere, and has become the single most favored piece of slander literature in the world. It may very well have caused World War II. In addition to all the harm it has done to Jews -- especially poor Jews with no power to rule anything, and no defence against mob violence -- it must be noted that virtually every "dirty trick" described in the pamphlet has been employed by governments throughout the world. Furthermore, everything which the pamphlet prophesied about the world economy has either come to pass, or else is about to do so. I'll point these things out as we read them in the body of the text.

Concerning Marsden's quote from Henry Ford, I cannot refrain from making the following cynical remark: "Have you driven a Ford lately?" American cars have 100 times as many defects as Japanese cars. It therefore might be better for us if we refrain from drawing too many conclusions from the opinions of a manufacturer of second-rate automobiles. Might the opinions be second-rate also?

The quotes from Herzl and Weizmann are too silly to bear commentary, but it ought to be noted that both were socialists, and hardly what any God-fearing Jew or Christian would call "Jews" in any meaningful religious sense of the word. Once a man rejects God and embraces Karl Marx, he's a threat to world peace no matter what his "religion" was.

Concerning the Prince of Wales, whom the ignoramus Marsden evidently has profound respect for, it ought to be noted that a goodly number of Christians think that the Prince of Wales is the antichrist. A sobering book has recently been written on this subject**.

The most disturbing part of Marsden's Introduction is the oft-quoted remark by Benjamin Disraeli. Because Disraeli was successful politically, and because he was rich, his words are taken much more seriously than they ought to be. He was actually an arrogant and conceited man, with a profound ignorance about the subject of race. A discussion of the life of Disraeli is long and drawn out, and consequently I have put it in an electronic footnote. If you wish to read it, click here. For now, let us return to "Protocols".







Protocol No. 1

1. .... Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we shall throw light upon surrounding facts.

2. What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from the two points of view, that of ourselves and that of the goyim [i.e., non-Jews].

3. It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorisation, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.

4. What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men? What has served for their guidance hitherto?

5. In the beginnings of the structure of society they were subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards--to Law, which is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature right lies in force.

6. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism.


7. In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled. The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to self-government for a certain length of time for that people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes.

8. Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes -- in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not -- it goes to the bottom.

9. Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections as the above are immoral I would put the following questions: -- If every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of attack and defence, to attack him by night or in superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the commonweal, be called immoral and not permissible?

10. Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more favour with the people, whose powers of reasoning are superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, traditions and sentimental theorism, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance of political secrets, puts forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy.

11. The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, but we must in no wise be guided by them.


12. Our right lies in force. The work "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: --Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.

13. Where does right begin? Where does it end?

14. In any State in which there is a bad organisation of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right--to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism.

15. Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invincible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.

16. Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.

17. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught.

18. In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. It must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless and unreasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into the abyss; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.

19. Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can have understanding of the words that can be made up of the political alphabet.

20. A people left to itself, i.e., to upstarts from its midst, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of power and honours and the disorders arising therefrom. Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgment, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interests? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable; for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.


21. It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilisation which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is savage, and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery.

22. Behold the alcoholised animals, bemused with drink, the right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It is not for us and ours to walk that road. The peoples of the goyim are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into which it has been inducted by our special agents--by tutors, lackeys, governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by clerks and others, by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the goyim. In the number of these last I count also the so-called "society ladies," voluntary followers of the others in corruption and luxury.

23. Our countersign is -- Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty.

24. Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our super-government. It is enough for them to know that we are too merciless for all disobedience to cease.


25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since those days by stupid poll-parrots who from all sides round flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the goyim, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractness; did not note the contradiction of their meaning and inter-relation: did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political--to all those things the goyim paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on the meaning of the dynastic transferrence of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.

26. In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quite, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goya States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card--the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim, that class which was the only defence peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the eternal and genealogical aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.

27. Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men whom we wanted we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiabiliy for material needs of man; and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyse initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities.

28. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove.

29. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has placed them at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of appointment.




Well! One hardly knows where to begin.

I will try to keep my comments short in general, but for this first "Protocol", I must point out a few things, which will require a few words.

"Protocol No. 1" is a worthy introduction to the "science" of worthlessness. The astute among you will undoubtedly have noticed that all the dirty tricks of all the dirty govenments (and various other self-appointed "powers") in the world are concisely summarized here.

Therefore, it is essential that anyone who wants to understand government, and power in general, must read this book. Your "leaders" did, I assure you!

However, the question I wish to raise is whether this is a "Jewish" protocol. And the answer is: not at all.

Let's start with language. The word goyim is the Hebrew plural for the word goy, which means "nation". Goyim therefore means "nations". It does not mean "bad" nations, or "Christian" nations, or even "non-Jewish" nations generally. It just means "nations", period.

In the Bible, God does frequently refer to the nations other than His "chosen people", Israel, as goyim, although usually there is a clarifying phrase, i.e., "the nations round about you". It cannot be denied, however, that sometimes the word goyim alone does signify the non-Israelite nations. But on the other hand, God not infrequently uses the word goy to refer to Israel herself, in phrases such as "I will make you a holy nation (goy kadosh)".

Whoever wrote the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" was not Jewish, since the only Hebrew word he knew was goyim, and he obviously did not know what the word actually means. You may, for example, have notice the pseudo-word goya being used in the phrase "goya States" (Protocol 1:26). In addition to the fact that there's no such word as "goya", it ought to be noted that the phrase "goya States", even disregarding the incorrect spelling, means "state states", and is highly unlikely to have been written by a Jew.

If you can stand to, and you read the entire text of "Protocols", you'll see the word goyim thrown in over and over again, from beginning to end. However, there are no other Hebrew words anywhere in the book. Odd, is it not?

Clearly the writer was a relatively illiterate man such as Sergyei Nilus, who believed (and quite correctly, it turns out), that by throwing in a single Hebrew word, he could fool people into believing that he had "discovered" a secret Jewish document.

On the other hand, Nilus managed to slip in that reference to the "blind leading the blind", taken from the sayings of Jesus, which shows that he had at least a rudimentary Christian upbringing. I doubt he had more than that.

A further clue as to the identity of the true author comes from the saying: "Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity..."

Wait a minute! That's not "ancient" times ... that's the French Revolution!

We have already reviewed the belief of many historians of "Protocols" that the true author, presumably Nilus, was obsessed with the French Revolution, and with the plain fact that it was being extended into the Court of Nicholas and Alexandra by the agents of "Illuminated" Freemasonry via the activities of Rasputin and his colleagues. The "canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the goyim..." were none other than Rasputin and company. But the soon-to-be victims were Nilus and the other petty Russian nobles, whom he refers to as "the eternal and genealogical aristocracy", once again revealing a clue to his identity.

Is there a "power elite" in the world? Yes, there is, and just about everyone knows it. Is it "Jewish"? It may be that, relative to the tiny size of the world's Jewish population, the "power elite" is disproportionately "Jewish" in name. Nevertheless, I would have to question the Jewish credentials of any man or woman who supported the political views espoused in "Protocols". The question becomes: "What is a Jew?"

You might also ask yourself: "What is a Christian?" These are the real questions.

The central teaching of the Jewish religion is "love thy neighbor as thyself", which Hillel proclaimed to be the "entire law". Jesus taught the same in the Sermon on the Mount, and everything Jesus said is incorporated by reference into Islam (see Qu'ran 61:6, which is discussed elsewhere in this Web Site -- see Table of Contents).

The "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" teaches that you should hate your neighbor, and use every power at your disposal to rob him, injure him, deceive him, and ultimately destroy him. How can this be a "Jewish" protocol? Or, for that matter, how could it be a "Christian" protocol, or anything at all other than a Satanic protocol?

Today, Rosh Hashona 1999, is the Day of Decision, where you decide what YOU are. Never mind about anyone else. Are there really people who have more rights than other people? Or not? And if there are, what gives them their rights?

Are you willing to work actively toward -- or yield passively to -- a system which establishes, PERMANENTLY, a class of privileged to rule over a mass of enslaved? Which class will YOU be in? You may think you're worthy of being a "ruler", but what if you become a slave? Can you live with it? Can your children live with it?

If you desire that such a system ought not to be permitted to happen, then you must read "Protocols", but you must not make the mistake of believing that the author was Jewish. If, God forbid, you repeat the crime of the past, to murder Jews, starting with Jesus (don't try to wiggle out of it, because I can't be fooled) and ending up with the Holocaust, then you are seriously mistaken on two counts:

1. You have permitted yourself to believe that there is someone who is "dirty", i.e., "the Jews", and someone who is "clean", i.e., yourself. Everyone alive on earth is filthy with sin, and there is no "clean". If you think you've located the "dirt", and that it's outside yourself, then you have fallen for the Devil's first and foremost trap; namely to dupe us into believing that we are "clean", and that the only thing keeping us from the luxury and comfort we "deserve" is our fear of simply reaching out and grabbing -- starting with the fruit on the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, and culminating in the blood of our "enemies". The real enemy is YOURSELF, and the reward for anyone who denies being a sinner in need of salvation is Hell.

2. Bear in mind that even if there was a "Jewish" banking conspiracy, you'll never catch the conspirators. Murderous mobs only catch the weak and helpless. The bankers -- Jew and non-Jew alike -- know when you're coming. They own homes all over the world, and when it gets difficult in one country, they'll flee to another -- long, long before you even figure out their address. Thus, you'll end up spilling innocent blood, which is what you've been doing all along.

Keep reading these "Protocols". Read and learn. If God puts wisdom into you, then it will gradually dawn upon you, as you read, that the enemy was yourself all along. By being selfish, and by lacking faith in God's saving Grace, you have empowered those with more money than you to create a false god of Gold.

Until you break your addiction to money, which this Web Site teaches you to do, you will forever be subject to the whims of people like the ones hypothesized by "Protocols". The truth of the matter is that it DOESN'T MATTER whether or not "Protocols" is true. The world is filled with wicked people, and no sooner is one set pulled down, then another rises up. You cannot remove evil by targeting an "enemy". The enemy is YOU.

Now, back to our "text".




Protocol No. 2

1. It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus be brought on to the economic ground, where the nations will not fail to perceive in the assistance we give the strength of our predominance, and this state of things will put both sides at the mercy of our international agentur; which possesses millions of eyes ever on the watch and unhampered by any limitations whatsoever. Our international rights will then wipe out national rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their subjects among themselves.


3. Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives h ave had upon the minds of the goyim.

4. It is indispensable for us to take account of the thoughts, characters, tendencies of the nations in order to avoid making slips in the political and in the direction of administrative affairs. The triumph of our system, of which the component parts of the machinery may be variously disposed according to the temperament of the peoples met on our way, will fail of success if the practical application of it be not based upon a summing up of the lessons of the past in the light of the present.

5. In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing our requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the goyim States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the Press we have got the gold in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand goyim.



The idea that international arms agents promote war and then sell arms to both sides is hardly new, and few people doubt it. Nor is it a crime under any applicable international law; even less so in 1890 when the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" hoax was penned.

Is it immoral to promote war, and then sell weapons? Yes; according to all major systems of morality, it is immoral. It's a "profession" which is not regulated by any current law. Is it "Jewish"? No more so than any other "profession". There are a lot of Jewish doctors and lawyers, and there are undoubtedly Jews who promote war and sell weapons. But the best-known war profiteer of this century was no Jew, but Aristotle Onasis, the final husband of Jacqueline Kennedy.

Calling Darwinism and Marxism "Jewish" is absurd. The Bible states with clarity that God created man, and no orthodox Jew, Christian or Muslim can possibly believe in the Darwinian evolution hoax and still fear God. Marx called religion the "opium of the masses", and his leading disciple was quoted as saying "every word out of the mouth of God is filth". No Marxist ought to be counted as a Jew. Although the apostate of every major religion have been duped by Darwin and Marx, the devout and God-fearing have not been fooled.

The control of the press** and the seizure of gold by international banking interests** are harsh realities, and, in fact, have gone much farther than they were at the time of the writing of "Protocols". Click on these links to read about these subjects, which are of pressing importance. Jews were involved in each of these disasters, but they are nevertheless not, by their nature, "Jewish". The erection of new concentration camps, and the slaughter of any number of millions more Jews will not recover your gold, or free up your press, because you don't recognize where the trouble lies.

The reason your gold was expropriated is because you love gold. Collectively, you have raised up a government of gold-lovers like yourself, and -- naturally -- those whom you empowered to rule over you took all of your gold. After all, that's what YOU would have done had YOU risen to power. Why shouldn't they have done the same?

The reason your press is a pack of lies is because YOU hate the truth. If you claim to be completely honest, then you must be perfected already, and this nightmare world we live in must be "heaven". God forbid.



Protocol No. 3

1. To-day I may tell you that our goal is now only a few steps off. There remains a small space to cross and the whole long path we have trodden is ready now to close its cycle of the Symbolic Snake, by which we symbolise our people. When this ring closes, all the States of Europe will be locked in its coil as in a powerful vice.

2. The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down, for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The goyim are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales would come into equilibrium. But the pivots--the kings on their thrones--are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible power. This power they owe to the terror which has been breathed into the palaces. As they have no means of getting at their people, into their very midst, the kings on their thrones are no longer able to come to terms with them and so strengthen themselves against seekers after power. We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart.

3. In order to incite seekers after power to a misuse of power we have set all forces in opposition one to another, breaking up their liberal tendencies towards independence. To this end we have stirred up every form of enterprise, we have armed all parties, we have set up authority as a target for every ambition. Of States we have made gladiatorial arenas where a lot of confused issues contend ... A little more, and disorders and bankruptcy will be universal ...

4. Babblers inexhaustible have turned into oratorical contests the sittings of Parliament and Administrative Boards. Bold journalists and unscrupulous pamphleteers daily fall upon executive officials. Abuses of power will put the final touch in preparing all institutions for their overthrow and everything will fly skyward under the blows of the maddened mob.


5. All people are chained down to heavy toil by poverty more firmly than ever they were chained by slavery and serfdom; from these, one way and another, they might free themselves, these could be settled with, but from want they will never get away. We have included in the constitution such rights as to the masses appear fictitious and not actual rights. All these so-called "People's Rights" can exist only in idea, an idea which can never be realised in practical life. What is it to the proletariat labourer, bowed double over his heavy toil, crushed by his lot in life, if talkers get the right to babble, if journalists get the right to scribble any nonsense side by side with good stuff, once the proletariat has no other profit out of the constitution save only those pitiful crumbs which we fling them from our table in return for their voting in favor of what we dictate, in favour of the men we place in power, the servants of our agentur ... Republican rights for a poor man are no more than a bitter piece of irony, for the necessity he is under of toiling almost all day gives him no present use of them, but the other hand robs him of all guarantee of regular and certain earnings by making him dependent on strikes by his comrades or lockouts by his masters.


6. The people under our guidance have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their one and only defence and foster-mother for the sake of their own advantage which is inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people. Nowadays, with the destruction of the aristocracy, the people have fallen into the grips of merciless money-grinding scoundrels who have laid a pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers.

7. We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces -- Socialists, Anarchists, Communists -- to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry. The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labour of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested in just the opposite -- in the diminution, the killing out of the GOYIM. Our power is in the chronic shortness of food and physical weakness of the worker because by all that this implies he is made the slave of our will, and he will not find in his own authorities either strength or energy to set against our will. Hunger creates the right of capital to rule the worker more surely than it was given to the aristocracy by the legal authority of kings.

8. By want and the envy and hatred which it engenders we shall move the mobs and with their hands we shall wipe out all those who hinder us on our way.

9. When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned, it is these same hands which will sweep away everything that might be a hindrance thereto.

10. The goyim have lost the habit of thinking unless prompted by the suggestions of our specialists. Therefore they do not see the urgent necessity of what we, when our kingdom comes, shall adopt at once, namely this, that it is essential to teach in national schools one simple, true piece of knowledge, the basis of all social existence, which requires division of labour, and, consequently, the division of men into classes and conditions. It is essential for all to know that owing to differences in the objects of human activity there cannot be any equality, that he who by any act of his compromises a whole class cannot be equally responsible before the law with him who affects no one but only his own honour. The true knowledge of the structure of society, into the secrets of which we do not admit the goyim, would demonstrate to all men that the positions and work must be kept within a certain circle, that they may not become a source of human suffering, arising from an education which does not correspond with the work which individuals are called upon to do. After a thorough study of this knowledge the peoples will voluntarily submit to authority and accept such position as is appointed them in the State. In the present state of knowledge and the direction we have given to its development the people, blindly believing things in print--cherishes--thanks to promptings intended to mislead and to its own ignorance--a blind hatred towards all conditions which it considers above itself, for it has no understanding of the meaning of class and condition.


11. This hatred will be still further magnified by the effects of an economic crisis, which will stop dealing on the exchanges and bring industry to a standstill. We shall create by all the secret subterranean methods open to us and with the aid of gold, which is all in our hands, a universal economic crisis whereby we shall throw upon the streets whole mobs of workers simultaneously in all the countries of Europe. These mobs will rush delightedly to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles, and whose property they will then be able to loot.

12. "Ours" they will not touch, because the moment of attack will be known to us and we shall take measures to protect our own.

13. We have demonstrated that progress will bring all the goyim to the sovereignty of reason. Our despotism will be precisely ; for it will know how by wise severities to pacificate all unrest, to cauterise liberalism out of all institutions.

14. When the populace has seen that all sorts of concessions and indulgences are yielded it, in the same name of freedom it has imagined itself to be sovereign lord and has stormed its way to power, but, naturally, like every other blind man it has come upon a host of stumbling blocks, it has rushed to find a guide, it has never had the sense to return to the former state and it has laid down its plenipotentiary powers at our feet. Remember the French Revolution, to which it was we who gave the name of "Great": the secrets of its preparations are well know to us for it was wholly the work of our hands.

15. Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favour of that King-Despot of the blood of Zion, whom we are preparing for the world.

16. At the present day we are, as an international force, invincible, because if attacked by some we are supported by other States. It is the bottomless rascality of the goyim peoples, who crawl on their bellies to force, but are merciless towards weakness, unsparing to faults and indulgent to crimes, unwilling to bear the contradictions of a free social system but patient unto martyrdom under the violence of a bold despotism--it is those qualities which are aiding us to independence. From the premier-dictators of the present day the goyim peoples suffer patiently and bear such abuses as for the least of them they would have beheaded twenty kings.

17. What is the explanation of this phenomenon, this curious inconsequence of the masses of the peoples in their attitude towards what would appear to be events of the same order?

18. It is explained by the fact that these dictators whisper to the peoples through their agents that through these abuses they are inflicting injury on the States with the highest purpose--to secure the welfare of the peoples, the international brotherhood of them all, their solidarity and equality of rights. Naturally they do not tell the peoples that this unification must be accomplished only under our sovereign rule.

19. And thus the people condemn the upright and acquit the guilty, persuaded ever more and more that it can do whatsoever it wishes. Thanks to this state of things the people are destroying every kind of stability and creating disorders at every step.

20. The word "freedom" brings out the communities of men to fight against every kind of force, against every kind of authority even against God and the laws of nature. For this reason we, when we come into our kingdom, shall have to erase this word from the lexicon of life as implying a principle of brute force which turns mobs into bloodthirsty beasts.

21. These beasts, it is true, fall asleep again every time when they have drunk their fill of blood, and at such times can easily be riveted into their chains. But if they be not given blood they will not sleep and continue to struggle.



The "Symbolic Snake" closing itself into a circle, is, and always has been a symbol of Lucifer. The symbol shows up frequently in occult literature, especially literature of the "Illuminati", considered by most observers to be a branch of Freemasonry. It's certainly not a Jewish symbol, nor ever has been. Unless, of course, "the Jew is the Devil".

If you get a secret thrill out of pretending that "the Jew is the Devil", then go ahead and take "action". Get out your pitchfork and do what your forefathers did: commit murder. But the power elite wants you to do that! You see, they are ready to declare Martial Law right now, and you'll only be giving them the excuse they seek.

The actual fact of the matter is that the power elite really is poised on the brink of total world control through a one-world electronic currency system -- the "Mark of the Beast". Many well-intentioned Christian patriots think that they will prevent this from happening by armed resistance. Not a chance!

The power elite is infinitely stronger than you militarily, and besides, every Christian sect is pitted in a life-and-death struggle against every other Christian sect, not to mention the life-and-death struggle Christians imagine themselves to be having against Islam, Judaism, Hinduism and Buddhism. "A house divided against itself shall inherit the wind". Remember?

The only salvation even remotely plausible is the salvation offered by "Messiah", which translates down to a single principle, "Love your neighbor as yourself". Because mankind has chosen money over God all along, this proves, in the final analysis, to be a financial matter, and forms the subject of most of this Web Site. If you are prepared to love your neighbor, then no "World Bank" can touch you. If you still can't -- in spite of all the blood of all the prophets which has been shed for all these millennia -- love your neighbor, then you'll go down. You cannot restrain the power elite by force. It's not merely "too late", it's beyond "too late".

This business of "chaining down the people through poverty" is serious stuff. America's wealth has already been 100% consumed by a totally-fraudulent currency system**, and we are indeed on the verge of being subsumed into a one-world electronic currency system which will be even worse. Then, the power elite will be able to erase all your electronic "net worth" with a few keystrokes on a remote computer which you'll never even see. Don't let this happen to you!

A final comment on Protocol No. 3. It is here that the liar who wrote this thing first introduces the concept of a "Sovereign Lord of all the World", a "King-Despot of the blood of Zion". This is supposed to be the Jewish "Messiah", but it's plainly evident that the character being described is the antichrist, not anybody's "Messiah".

The ultimate joke about "Protocols" is that in Protocol No. 24 (look ahead if you wish**), these charmers tell you, with a straight face, that if they don't like the fool they crown as the "King-Despot of the blood of Zion", they'll remove him!! So who's the real "King"? Why, it's them! It is them, it always was them, and it always will be them.

And if "they" are already the "King", and this "Sovereign Lord of the World" is merely a figurehead whom they can remove at will, then what purpose does he serve? Can't they just appoint a figurehead right now, and avoid all this huffing, puffing and grunting?

Of course they can, if they exist. The problem is obviously that they don't exist. The part of "Protocols" which alleges a "Jewish" conspiracy, whose purpose is to crown a "King-Despot of the blood of Zion", is a hoax.

HOWEVER, the parts which relate to a conspiracy of a shadowy power elite, to seize complete dominion in the world, is no hoax. But it's not Jewish. If you waste your time looking for a Jewish "enemy", and neglect the real enemy within yourself, you'll lose the game, and you'll be enslaved. This is scheduled to begin taking place in the immediate future, and if you do the wrong thing, and allow it to come to pass, there will be no escape.



Protocol No. 4

1. Every republic passes through several stages. The first of these is comprised in the early days of mad raging by the blind mob, tossed hither and thither, right and left: the second is demagogy from which is born anarchy, and that leads inevitably to despotism--not any longer legal and overt, and therefore responsible despotism, but to unseen and secretly hidden, yet nevertheless sensibly felt despotism in the hands of some secret organisation or other, whose acts are the more unscrupulous inasmuch as it works behind a screen, behind the backs of all sorts of agents, the changing of whim not only does not injuriously affect but actually aids the secret force by saving it, thanks to continual changes, from the necessity of expanding its resources on the rewarding of long services.

2. Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.


3. But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negatived by the very laws of creation, for they have established subordination. With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why it is indipensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the mind of the GOYIM the very principle of Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.

4. In order to give the goyim no time to think and take note, their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus, all the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe. But again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the goyim, we must put industry on a speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.

5. The intensified struggle for superiority and shocks delivered to economic life will create, nay, have already created, disenchanted, cold and heartless communities. Such communities will foster a strong aversion towards the higher political and towards religion. Their only guide is gain, that is Gold, which they will erect into a veritable cult, for the sake of those material delights which it can give. Then will the hour strike when, not for the sake of attaining the good, not even to win wealth, but solely out of hatred towards the privileged, the lower classes of the goyim will follow our lead against our rivals for power, the intellectuals of the goyim.



Protocol No. 4 opens with a distorted version of Socrates' discourse on the corrupt phases through which the governments of nations inevitably pass when Philosophers do not rule over them. It then identifies "masonry" as the front for the plan for world conquest. Although we say repeatedly that "Protocols" is a hoax, we also say repeatedly that it is not entirely fraudulent. The identification here of "masonry" as the visible face, or at least one of the visible faces, of the elite monied group(s) striving for world power, is in agreement with the great majority of power elite "watchers", who have generally attributed the quest for world domination to Freemasonry in one or another of its various manifestations.

Masonry, it should be noted, has always accepted Jews, but cannot be said to have a Jewish "root", since it has also accepted other minorities as well. In fact, it has distinguished itself at times, by accepting minorities in instances where the mainstream has refused to do so. In India in the heyday of the British Empire, for example, the Freemasons recognized Indian Lodges, whereas the arrogant English would not allow Indians to enter into schools or professions, or occupy political positions of any significance. In America, Masonry accepted African-Americans long before it became "politically correct", in the eyes of the public at large, to do so.

Protocol 4:3 contains the remarkable suggestion that the world could go well if it were ruled over by a "wardship of parishes"! Although everyone has heard the word "parish", few non-Catholics actually know what the word means. A "parish" is an ecclesiastical district of the Catholic Church. These districts were first introduced at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, and re-organized at the Council of Trent in the sixteenth century.

Few Jews know what a "parish" is, and no Jew, writing about the ideal form of world government, would even dream of calling it a "wardship of parishes". But a Russian Catholic petty noble, like Sergyei Nilus, would. Therefore, we may be assured that a Catholic like Nilus -- someone who didn't know what "goyim" meant, but who did know what "parish" meant --was the author of Protocols.

The plan to "tear out of the mind...the very principle of Godhead and the spirit" is directly contrary to Biblical teaching, which states explicitly that in the End Times "the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD, as the waters cover the sea" (Isaiah 11:9). This "tearing out" business is therefore not a "Jewish" teaching, but an antichrist teaching from the mind of Satan.

Anyone who fails to recognize the danger of the rapidly-approaching one-world banking dictatorship under Satan, and who wastes these last few precious months indulging himself with pointless anti-Semitic pogroms, will receive his reward. He may get the "pleasure" of seeing the blood of Jews, but even as he rejoices over it, the prison door of one-world enslavement will be shutting upon him, with great finality.



Protocol No. 5

1. What form of administrative rule can be given to communities in which corruption has penetrated everywhere, communities where riches are attained only by the clever surprise tactics of semi-swindling tricks; where looseness reigns; where morality is maintained by penal measures and harsh laws but not by voluntarily accepted principles; where the feelings toward faith and country are obligated by cosmopolitan convictions? What form of rule is to be given to these communities if not that despotism which I shall describe to you later? We shall create an intensified contralisation of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the goyim, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word.

2. We shall be told that such a despotism as I speak of is not consistent with the progress of these days, but I will prove to you that it is.

3. In the times when the peoples looked upon kings on their thrones as on a pure manifestation of the will of God, they submitted without a murmur to the despotic power of kings: but from the day when we insinuated into their minds the conception of their own rights they began to regard the occupants of thrones as mere ordinary mortals. The holy unction of the Lord's Anointed has fallen from the heads of kings in the eyes of the people, and when we also robbed them of their faith in God the might of power was flung upon the streets in to the place of public proprietorship and was seized by us.


4. Moreover, the art of directing masses and individuals by means of cleverly manipulated theory and verbitage, by regulations of life in common and all sorts of other quirks, in all which the goyim understand nothing, belongs likewise to the specialists of our administrative brain. Reared on analysis, observation, on delicacies of fine calculation, in this species of skill we have not rivals, any more than we have either in the drawing up of plans of political actions and solidarity. In this respect the Jesuits along might have compared with us, but we have contrived to discredit them in the eyes of the unthinking mob as an overt organisation, while we ourselves all the while have kept our secret organisation in the shade. However, it is probably all the same to the world who is its sovereign lord, whether the head of Catholicism or our despot of the blood of Zion! But to us, the Chosen People, it is very far from being a matter of indifference.



Note that the author of "Protocols", who pretends to be a committee of 300 "Jews", gives you exactly two choices as to who ought to rule the world: the head of Catholicism, or the "despot of the blood of Zion". Since the latter is presented as being a scoundrel, it follows that the only suitable ruler for all the world is the head of Catholicism. Now, ask yourself: Who would opine that the only suitable ruler for the whole world is the "head of Catholicism"? A committee of 300 Jews? Or Sergyei Nilus, an ambitious Catholic?

And what about the highly favorable reference to the Jesuits? The Jesuits ran the Spanish Inquisition, which robbed and murdered more Jews than any institution before the Third Reich. A Catholic would admire that a lot. But would a committee of 300 Jews sing the praises of the Jesuits?



5. For a time perhaps we might be successfully dealt with by a coalition of the GOYIM of all the world: but from this danger we are secured by the discord existing among them whose roots are so deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up. We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the goyim, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries. This is the reason why there is not one State which would anywhere receive support if it were to raise its arm, for every one of them must bear in mind that any agreement against us would be unprofitable to itself. We are too strong -- there is no evading our power. The nations cannot come to even an inconsiderable private agreement without our secretly having a hand in it.

6. Per Me reges regnant. "It is through me that Kings reign." And it was said by the prophets that we were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth. God has endowed us with genius that we may be equal to our task. Were genius in the opposite camp it would still struggle against us, but even so a newcomer is no match for the old-established settler: the struggle would be merciless between us, such a fight as the world has never seen. Aye, and the genius on their side would have arrived too late. All the wheels of the machinery of all States go by the force of the engine, which is in our hands, and that engine of the machinery of States is -- Gold. The science of political economy invented by our learned elders has for long past been giving royal prestige to capital.



It was most assuredly NOT said by any prophet in our Bible that Jews would "rule over the whole earth". My mission is to teach the truth: The House of David has spread far and wide, encompassing many faiths and nations, in both East and West.

When the Bible says that the House of David will rise again, it means that the Golden Rule will become a living Rule, and will no longer be a lifeless lesson in "ethics", to be read and discarded. This is the same as saying that in the End, the "Law will be written in your hearts", not merely on paper, as prophesied by Moses, Jeremiah, and Jesus.

I hereby post a strict warning to any Jew who really and truly believes what "Protocols" alleges; namely that he is entitled to rob, defraud, and murder Christians simply because of all the money he has expropriated, or because he imagines, in his depraved fantasy world, that the Bible has appointed him "King": You deserve to suffer the evil fate that you have imagined for others, and you surely will.





7. Capital, if it is to co-operate untrammelled, must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade: this is already being put in execution by an unseen hand in all quarters of the world. This freedom will give political force to those engaged in industry, and that will help to oppress the people. Nowadays it is more important to disarm the peoples than to lead them into war: more important to use for our advantage the passions which have burst into flames than to quench their fire: more important to catch up and interpret the ideas of others to suit ourselves than to eradicate them. The principle object of our directorate consists in this: to debilitate the public mind by criticism; to lead it away from serious reflections calculated to arouse resistance; to distract the forces of the mind towards a sham fight of empty eloquence.



Note the great importance attached to the necessity of "disarming the peoples". Perhaps you can now understand why Christian patriots are so uncompromisingly opposed to gun control.





8. In all ages the people of the world, equally with individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for they are content with a show and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance. Therefore we shall establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of their benefit to progress.

9. We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy of all parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a voice in orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust the patience of their hearers and produce an abhorrence of oratory.

10. In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the GOYIM lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public. This is the first secret.

11. The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in the following: To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative; if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence. The strain which results from freedom of action saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments, failures. By all these means we shall so wear down the GOYIM that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature that by its position will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the State forces of the world and to form a Super-Government. In place of the rulers of to-day we shall set up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government Administration. Its hands will reach out in all directions like nippers and its organisation will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.



A recurrent theme in this last Protocol, and in the "Protocols" in general, is the importance of enslaving people through the power of Gold, and through total control of the Capitalist process in general. Although this is presented as being an "ancient" principle, no writer I know of doubts that this is a distinct reference to the Rothschild family, and to the other Jewish and non-Jewish banking families who collectively usurped the power of the monarchies of Europe in the nineteenth centuries, replacing the rule of dynastic bloodlines with the rule of money.

It is a great tragedy that the average Jew, literally to this very day, regards the Rothschild family as being "good". Why? Because (a) they're "Jewish" (but are they really Jewish -- I think they're Devil worshippers), and (b) because they give money to Israel.

The current Israeli nation, which is built on a shaky foundation of paper fiat money, and which steadfastly REFUSES to be ruled over by Torah, is already doomed. I pray with all my heart to our Father in Heaven that a holy nation may be built upon the current worldly one, without the necessity of the current one being burned to the ground. Unfortunately, the Bible clearly prophesizes trouble. Big trouble.

And it won't just be in Israel, because the truth of the matter is that wickedness has consumed every nation on earth, so that a Day of Reckoning is now unavoidable. The only important choice remaining is for each person to figure out which side he's on.



Protocol No. 6

1. We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even large fortunes of the goyim will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of the States on the day after the political smash...

2. You gentlemen here present who are economists, just strike an estimate of the significance of this combination!....

3. In every possible way we must develop the significance of our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector and Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us.

4. The aristocracy of the goyim as a political force, is dead -- We need not take it into account; but as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are self-sufficing in the resources upon which they live. It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land. This object will be best attained by increasing the burdens upon landed property -- in loading lands with debts. These measures will check land-holding and keep it in a state of humble and unconditional submission.

5. The aristocrats of the goyim, being hereditarily incapable of contenting themselves with little, will rapidly burn up and fizzle out.


6. At the same time we must intensively patronise trade and industry, but, first and foremost, speculation, the part played by which is to provide a counterpoise to industry: the absence of speculative industry will multiply capital in private hands and will serve to restore agriculture by freeing the land from indebtedness to the land banks. What we want is that industry should drain off from the land both labour and capital and by means of speculation transfer into our hands all the money of the world, and thereby throw all the goyim into the ranks of the proletariat. Then the goyim will bow down before us, if for no other reason but to get the right to exist.



Here, and in many other places in "Protocols", we see paranoid references to Marxism. The author was evidently quite terrified of the prospects of a Marxist world takeover.

An interesting aspect of this view of Marxism is that it is seen as a cover for this ultra-capitalistic world-banking dictatorship we see here described in Protocol after Protocol. This view is in agreement with the views of modern commentators, who duly note that the Russian Revolution received life-saving financial aid from Rockefeller's First National City Bank, and that the staged "downfall" of the Soviet Union changed very little there, except for the name of the form of government. Although it was previously called a "Communist" government, it was always a covert bank dictatorship, as becomes increasingly evident with time.



7. To complete the ruin of the industry of the goyim we shall bring to the assistance of speculation the luxury which we have developed among the goyim, that greedy demand for luxury which is swallowing up everything. We shall raise the rate of wages which however, will not bring any advantage to the workers, for, at the same time, we shall produce a rise in prices of the first necessaries of life, alleging that it arises from the decline of agriculture and cattle-breeding: we shall further undermine artfully and deeply sources of production, by accustoming the workers to anarchy and to drunkenness and side by side therewith taking all measure to extirpate from the face of the earth all the educated forces of the GOYIM.

8. In order that the true meaning of things may not strike the GOYIM before the proper time we shall mask it under an alleged ardent desire to serve the working classes and the great principles of political economy about which our economic theories are carrying on an energetic propaganda.



The statement, "We shall raise the rate of wages which however, will not bring any advantage to the workers, for, at the same time, we shall produce a rise in prices of the first necessaries of life" one of the most important principles of the New World Order. The reason the lying author of "Protocols" knew of this principle was not, as he would have you believe, that "they" (i.e., "Jews") control the prices of everything, but because there is a power elite of international bankers who control the printing of un-backed paper money**. When the economies of nations depend upon the yearly printing of new money, then inflation is unstoppable, and no act of Congress or Parliament can prevent it.

This hopelessly evil system has within it the seeds of its own destruction. And when it goes down, it takes its home nation with it. In any country within which there is a British-style banking system, the rich continually get richer and the poor poorer, until the system crashes.

The Bank of England was inaugurated over a century before "Protocols" was written, which explains why the author knew about it.



Protocol No. 7

1. The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces--are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.

2. Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they will know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations. In order to succeed in this we must use great cunning and penetration during negotiations and agreements, but, as regards what is called the "official language," we shall keep to the opposite tactics and assume the mask of honesty and compliancy. In this way the peoples and governments of the goyim, whom we have taught to look only at the outside whatever we present to their notice, will still continue to accept us as the benefactors and saviours of the human race.



The statement about "the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations" is obviously taken from Disraeli's fictional work "Coningsby"**, and not from any personal experience or knowledge possessed by a petty noble like Nilus.

There is no doubt that Disraeli believed himself to be speaking the "truth", but I don't believe him. You'll have to decide for yourself.




3. We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbours of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbours should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.

4. The principal factor of success in the political is the secrecy of its undertakings: the word should not agree with the deeds of the diplomat.

5. We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action in the direction favored by our widely-conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly promoted by us through the means of that so-called "Great Power" -- the Press, which, with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands.



The press is surely controlled, and just about everyone knows it at this point.

Yes, you can get any ball score you want. Any ball score.

You can also find out about the latest sexual improprieties of American politicians -- Republican as well as Democrat.

But if you want to really know what's going on in the world, vis-à-vis the fact that you're about to be subsumed into a world banking dictatorship, you won't find it in any major newspaper, magazine, or television news report.

To read a chilling commentary on press censorship that's already 60 years old, click here**.



Protocol No. 8

1. We must arm ourselves with all the weapons which our opponents might employ against us. We must search out in the very finest shades of expression and the knotty points of the lexicon of law justification for those cases where we shall have to pronounce judgments that might appear abnormally audacious and unjust, for it is important that these resolutions should be set forth in expressions that shall seem to be the most exalted moral principles cast into legal form. Our directorate must surround itself with all these forces of civilisation among which it will have to work. It will surround itself with publicists, practical jurists, administrators, diplomats, and, finally, with persons prepared by a special super-educational training in our special schools. These persons will have cognisance of all the secrets of the social structure, they will know all the languages that can be made up by political alphabets and words; they will be made acquainted with the whole underside of human nature, with all its sensitive chords on which they will have to play. These chords are the cast of mind of the goyim, their tendencies, shortcomings, vices and qualities, their particularities of classes and conditions. Needless to say that the talented assistants of authority, of whom I speak, will be taken not from among the goyim, who are accustomed to perform their administrative work without giving themselves the trouble to think what its aim is, and never consider what it is needed for. The administrators of the goyim sign papers without reading them, and they serve either for mercenary reasons or from ambition.

2. We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form the principal subject of the teaching given to the Jews. Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and -- the main thing -- millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures.

3. For a time, until there will no longer be any risk in entrusting responsible posts in our State to our brother Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons whose past and reputation are such that between them and the people lies an abyss, persons who, in case of disobedience to our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear -- this in order to make them defend our interests to their last gasp.


Protocol No. 9

1. In applying our principles let attention be paid to the character of the people in whose country you live and act; a general, identical application of them, until such time as the people shall have been re-educated to our pattern, cannot have success. But by approaching their application cautiously you will see that not a decade will pass before the most stubborn character will change and we shall add a new people to the ranks of those already subdued by us.

2. The words of the liberal, which are in effect the words of our masonic watchword, namely, "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," will, when we come into our kingdom, be changed by us into words no longer of a watchword, but only an expression of idealism, namely, into "The right of liberty, the duty of equality, the ideal of brotherhood." That is how we shall put it, -- and so we shall catch the bull by the horns...De facto we have already wiped out every kind of rule except our own, although de jure there still remain a good many of them. Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is only pro forma at our discretion and by our direction, for their anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren. I will not enter into further explanations, for this matter has formed the subject of repeated discussions amongst us.



Note again the equating of "Jew" with "mason". However, when Masons are inducted into the higher orders of Freemasonry, numerous books which have now appeared on the subject confirm that the inductee is made to swear upon copies of the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Qu'ran, all three of which are put before him. This practice is equally repugnant to the orthodox of all three faiths, and can hardly be called "Jewish".

The "god" of Masonry is called "JABULON". Click here to learn what the word means.**

The remarkable statement is here made that "anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren", indicating that even Jews who have no money or power will have to die! In this instance the murders will be accomplished passively, by merely neglecting to restrain the bloodthirsty mob, which, in every other instance, they claim to have the power to control.

This is quite evidently Nilus' way of adding a ring of "authenticity" to his lying work, since it will be the common experience of everyone who investigates it that no Jew can be found who knows anything about the alleged "Jewish conspiracy" hypothesized by "Protocols".

In other words, we are to believe that, even though it is a "Jewish" conspiracy, even Jews don't know about it!




3. For us there are no checks to limit the range of our activity. Our Super-Government subsists in extra-legal conditions which are described in the accepted terminology by the energetic and forcible word--Dictatorship. I am in a position to tell you with a clear conscience that at the proper time we, the law-givers, shall execute judgment and sentence, we shall slay and we shall spare, we, as head of all our troops, are mounted on the steed of the leader. We rule by force of will, because in our hands are the fragments of a once powerful party, now vanquished by us. And the weapons in our hands are limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds and malice.



Wait a minute! Are we to be treated like complete idiots?

Even presupposing that there existed a world Jewish conspiracy, has anyone, anywhere, ever heard a dictator call himself "ambitious"? Or "greedy"? Or "merciless?" Never!

The dictators of history have all, to a man (and to a woman), called themselves "saviors". It is they who are the deliverers from evil. No dictator ever calls himself "evil"! It's always the other side which is "evil".

People who proudly proclaim themselves to be "evil" worship Satan. Therefore, Protocols is a hoax, unless you think that "the Jew is the Devil". If so, get your pitchfork and start murdering.

Start with the Son of Man, if you can find him. However, if you really believe that the Jew is "dirty", and that you are "clean", then brace yourself for His judgment, as it was said:

"Not every one that saith unto me, 'Lord, Lord', shall enter into the kingdom of heaven...And then will I profess unto them, 'I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity" (Matthew 7:21-23)



4. It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, restorating monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists, and utopian dreamers of every kind. We have harnessed them all to the task: each one of them on his own account is boring away at the last remnants of authority, is striving to overthrow all established form of order. By these acts all States are in torture; they exhort to tranquility, are ready to sacrifice everything for peace: but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super-Government, and with submissiveness.

5. The people have raised a howl about the necessity of settling the question of Socialism by way of an international agreement. Division into fractional parties has given them into our hands, for, in order to carry on a contested struggle one must have money, and the money is all in our hands.

6. We might have reason to apprehend a union between the "clear-sighted" force of the goy kings on their thrones and the "blind" force of the goy mobs, but we have taken all the needful measure against any such possibility: between the one and the other force we have erected a bulwark in the shape of a mutual terror between them. In this way the blind force of the people remains our support and we, and we only, shall provide them with a leader and, or course, direct them along the road that leads to our goal.

7. In order that the hand of the blind mob may not free itself from our guiding hand, we must every now and then enter into close communion with it, if not actually in person, at any rate through some of the most trusty of our brethren. When we are acknowledged as the only authority we shall discuss with the people personally on the market places, and we shall instruct them on questions of the political in such wise as may turn them in the direction that suits us.


10. We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated.

11. Above the existing laws without substantially altering them, and by merely twisting them into contradictions of interpretations, we have erected something grandiose in the way of results. These results found expression in the fact that the interpretations masked the law: afterwards they entirely hid them from the eyes of the governments owing to the impossibility of making anything out of the tangled web of legislation.

12. This is the origin of the theory of course of arbitration.

13. You may say that the goyim will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a manoeuvre of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail--the undergrounds, metropolitans, those subterranean corridors which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organisations and archives.



My heart, pitiful thing that it is, breaks when I read this sort of stuff. I see, in my mind's eye, a Christian mob driven to blind, insane rage by this sort of slander. The mob grabs itself weapons: clubs, pitchforks, guns and knives; and it careens down the street looking for a Jew -- any Jew -- to tear limb from limb.

Next, in my mind's eye, I see the mob finding a store owned by an old Jew; a man who has never harmed anyone, or robbed anyone, or thought evil of anyone. But the old Jew looks "funny", and therefore, the townspeople hate him. The local priest -- a direct ideological descendant of the "glory that was Rome" -- i.e., the power which was Pontius Pilate -- has severely fanned the flames of hate by telling the mob that "the Jews" killed Christ, forgetting entirely that he, in his ancestral role of Pilate, "approved" of the murder because it was politically expedient. Thus, denying entirely his own guilt, he has taught the mob that it is "clean".

With this in mind, the mob smashes the windows of the store, and drags the "dirty Jew" out into the street. While some hold him down, others rip his shirt off. A belt with a metal buckle is found, and the old man is whipped mercilessly, until his back is ripped to shreds and his blood runs down the street like water, to the delight of the crowd.

Tears pour uncontrollably from the old man's eyes, and he begins to pray to God for his life, and for the life of his soul. He also screams out to the mob for mercy, which only makes them flog him harder. He begs to be told what his "crime" was.

A copy of the "Learned Elders of Zion" is thrust into his bleeding face. The old man asks what it is, since he's never seen or heard of it.

"YOU SEE??!! YOU SEE??!!!", screams someone in the mob. "HE'S A LIAR, JUST LIKE THE BOOK SAYS!!!

Some booted thug then kicks the Jew's face in. There is a snap, as his neck breaks. The crowd screams with orgiastic delight, now completely out of control.

Just then, there's a siren. The police arrive, and the crowd disperses. But, when they realize what's been done, there are no arrests. You see, they've seen the book also, and they agree with the mob.

Warning: There is a living God, who watches everything, and has promised a Day of Reckoning. He has forbid false witness. The above scenario -- which has actually taken place many times throughout history, in many places -- is based entirely upon false witness, and upon the "principle" that any person or mob which takes pleasure in "other" people's pain, possessing the power to inflict pain without fear of reprisal, will eventually commit murder.

The Day of Reckoning is today.

You may not believe it, but the day has now arrived when anyone who continues to delight in the blood of his innocent neighbors -- ALL innocent neighbors -- will receive the Lord's justice. I promise you that this will happen.


P.S. The term "metropolitan", in Protocol 9:13 above, is another Catholic term, defined at the Council of Nicaea. Few Jews know what the word means, and its use once again demonstrates that "Protocols" is a fraud, a masterpiece of false witness written by a Catholic and designed to incite a mob to murder Jews.


Protocol No. 10

1. To-day I begin with a repetition of what I said before, and I beg you to bear in mind that governments and peoples are content in the political with outside appearances. And how, indeed, are the goyim to perceive the underlying meaning of things when their representatives give the best of their energies to enjoying themselves? For our policy it is of the greatest importance to take cognisance of this detail; it will be of assistance to us when we come to consider the division of authority, freedom of speech, of the press, of religion (faith), of the law of association, of equality before the law, of the inviolability of property, of the dwelling, of taxation (the idea of concealed taxes), of the reflex force of the laws. All these questions are such as ought not to be touched upon directly and openly before the people. In cases where it is indispensable to touch upon them they must not be categorically named, it must merely be declared without detailed exposition that the principles of contemporary law are acknowledged by us. The reason of keeping silence in this respect is that by not naming a principle we leave ourselves freedom of action, to drop this or that out of it without attracting notice; if they were all categorically named they would all appear to have been already given.

2. The mob cherishes a special affection and respect for the geniuses of political power and accepts all their deeds of violence with the admiring response: "rascally, well, yes, it is rascally, but it's clever!....a trick, if you like, but how craftily played, how magnificently done, what impudent audacity!"....


3. We count upon attracting all nations to the task of erecting the new fundamental structure, the project for which has been drawn up by us. This is why, before everything, it is indispensable for us to arm ourselves and to store up in ourselves that absolutely reckless audacity and irresistible might of the spirit which in the person of our active workers will break down all hindrances on our way.

4. When we have accomplished our coup d'etat we shall say then to the various peoples: "Everything has gone terribly badly, all have been worn out with suffering. We are destroying the causes of your torment--nationalities, frontiers, differences of coinages. You are at liberty, of course, to pronounce sentence upon us, but can it possibly be a just one if it is confirmed by you before you make any trial of what we are offering you."...Then will the mob exalt us and bear us up in their hands in a unanimous triumph of hopes and expectations. Voting, which we have made the instrument which will set us on the throne of the world by teaching even the very smallest units of members of the human race to vote by means of meetings and agreements by groups, will then have served its purposes and will play its part then for the last time by a unanimity of desire to make close acquaintance with us before condemning us.



Watch out! I've said over and over again, it's not a "Jewish" plan. But I also warned you that there is a plan.

Nationalities are indeed breaking down, and a one-world currency is close at hand. It will be fraudulent, and you will have no control over it. Christian patriots call it the "Mark of the Beast".

Killing Jews won't save you, because the enemy is YOU. Click here to learn more about how you have -- whether knowingly or unknowingly -- already acquiesced to a Luciferian "one-world" currency**.



5. To secure this we must have everybody vote without distinction of classes and qualifications, in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got from the educated propertied classes. In this way, by inculcating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy among the goyim the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off, for the mob, handled by us, will not let them come to the front nor even give them a hearing; it is accustomed to listen to us only who pay it for obedience and attention. In this way we shall create a blind, mighty force which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents set at its head by us as leaders of the mob. The people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all kinds of benefits.

6. A scheme of government should come ready made from one brain, because it will never be clinched firmly if it is allowed to be split into fractional parts in the minds of many. It is allowable, therefore, for us to have cognisance of the scheme of action but not to discuss it lest we disturb its artfulness, the interdependence of its component parts, the practical force of the secret meaning of each clause. To discuss and make alterations in a labour of this kind by means of numerous votings is to impress upon it the stamp of all ratiocinations and misunderstandings which have failed to penetrate the depth and nexus of its plottings. We want our schemes to be forcible and suitably concocted. Therefore WE OUGHT NOT TO FLING THE WORK OF GENIUS OF OUR GUIDE to the fangs of the mob or even of a select company.



Imagine that! And little old Sergyei Nilus got his hands on it. Incredible.



7. These schemes will not turn existing institutions upside down just yet. They will only affect changes in their economy and consequently in the whole combined movement of their progress, which will thus be directed along the paths laid down in our schemes.


8. Under various names there exists in all countries approximately one and the same thing. Representation, Ministry, Senate, State Council, Legislative and Executive Corps. I need not explain to you the mechanism of the relation of these institutions to one another, because you are aware of all that, only take note of the fact that each of the above-named institutions corresponds to some important function of the State, and I would beg you to remark that the word "important" I apply not to the institution but to the function, consequently it is not the institutions which are important but their functions. These institutions have divided up among themselves all the functions of government--administrative, legislative, executive, wherefore they have come to operate as do the organs in the human body. If we injure one part in the machinery of State, the State falls sick, like a human body, and....will die.

9. When we introduced into the State organism the poison of Liberalism its whole political complexion underwent a change. States have been seized with a mortal illness--blood-poisoning. All that remains is to await the end of their death agony.

10. Liberalism produced Constitutional States, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the goyim, namely, Despotism; and a constitution, as you well know, is nothing else but a school of discords, misunderstandings, quarrels, disagreements, fruitless party agitations, party whims--in a word, a school of everything that serves to destroy the personality of the State activity. The tribune of the "talkeries" has, no less effectively than the Press, condemned the rulers to inactivity and impotence, and thereby rendered them useless and superfluous, for which reason indeed they have been in many countries deposed. Then it was that the era of republics became possible of realisation; and then it was that we replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government--by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, our slaves. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the goy people, I should rather say, under the goy peoples.



Once again, the writer shows clearly that he prefers the "despotism" which existed before constitutional republics, i.e., the Monarchy. This is the voice of Nilus, or someone like him, pining in advance for the downfall of the Russian aristocracy.

This is not the voice of a committee of 300 "Jews".

Beware, however. There is abundant evidence that the form of one-world government contemplated by the world-bankers (some, but not all of whom are "Jewish") will be a frank monarchy, or some sort of carefully disguised dictatorship which will amount to the same thing. You can't escape from this by murdering Jews. Your only hope is to remove greed -- from yourself.




11. In the near future we shall establish the responsibility of presidents.

12. By that time we shall be in a position to disregard forms in carrying through matters for which our impersonal puppet will be responsible. What do we care if the ranks of those striving for power should be thinned, if there should arise a deadlock from the impossibility of finding presidents, a deadlock which will finally disorganise the country?....

13. In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some "Panama" or other -- then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages and honour connected with the office of president. The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect presidents, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make changes in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, a puppet in our hands. Naturally, the authority of the presidents will then become a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him with a means of self-defence in the right of an appeal to the people, for the decision of the people over the heads of their representatives, that is to say, an appeal to that same blind slave of ours--the majority of the mob. Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defence of the new republican constitution, the right to defend which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution.



If you are an American living under the Clinton "administration", and if the above doesn't grab you, then nothing will.

On the other hand, if you are beginning to understand that your "freedom" is a myth, and if you wonder just how long this has been going on, read "The New World Order" by Pat Robertson, Christian evangelist and former Republican candidate for President. This book can be found in any large bookstore (or visit Read it and you will see that it's been a long, long time since the American people really elected a president of their chosing.

In addition to the fact that all your Republican and Democratic candidates for president are carefully pre-screened by monied interests, the elections themselves are almost surely rigged. See** and votescam** for an eyeful.



14. It is easy to understand that in these conditions the key of the shrine will lie in our hands, and no one outside ourselves will any longer direct the force of legislation.

15. Besides this we shall, with the introduction of the new republican constitution, take from the Chamber thr right of interpellation on government measures, on the pretext of preserving political secrecy, and, further, we shall by the new constitution reduce the number of representatives to a minimum, thereby proportionately reducing political passions and the passion for politics. If, however, they should, which is hardly to be expected, burst into flame, even in this minimum, we shall nullify them by a stirring appeal and a reference to the majority of the whole people....Upon the president will depend the appointment of presidents and vice-presidents of the Chamber and the Senate. Instead of constant sessions of Parliaments we shall reduce their sittings to a few months. Moreover, the president, as chief of the executive power, will have the the right to summon and dissolve Parliament, and, in the latter case, to prolong the time for the appointment of a new parliamentary assembly. But in order that the consequences of all these acts which in substance are illegal, should not, prematurely for our plans, upon the responsibility established by use of the president, we shall instigate ministers and other officials of the higher administration about the president to evade his dispositions by taking measures of their own, for doing which they will be made the scapegoats in his place....This part we especially recommend to be given to be played by the Senate, the Council of State, or the Council of Ministers, but not to an individual official.

16. The president will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so, besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws, and even new departures in the government constitutional working, the pretext both for the one and the other being the requirements for the supreme welfare of the State.


17. By such measures we shall obtain the power of destroying little by little, step by step, all that at the outset when we enter on our rights, we are compelled to introduce into the constitutions of States to prepare for the transition to an imperceptible abolition of every kind of constitution, and then the time is come to turn every form of government into our despotism.

18. The recognition of our despot may also come before the destruction of the constitution; the moment for this recognition will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence--a matter which we shall arrange for--of their rulers, will clamour: "Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders--frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts--who will give us peace and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives."



If you have read other parts of this Web Site then you have already been reminded that the clamouring for a king can be traced back at least to Biblical times, as described in 1 Samuel Chapter 8.

It is uncanny that in America at this moment, a number approaching 50% of the population is clamouring right now for a one-world government with abolishment of nations, ethnicities and religions. What these people envision is a non-judgmental world in which everyone can do exactly what he pleases, whenever he pleases to do it.

This can never be, since what every man pleases, deep down inside, is to murder his neighbor, rape his neighbor's wife, steal his neighbor's property, and enslave his neighbor's children.

And his neighbor wants to do the same thing to him.

That is why God sent religion, which the "Protocols" -- alleged to be a "Jewish" document -- proposes to abolish. How could anyone be duped into believing that this is the Jewish blueprint for world domination, when both Hillel and Jesus proclaimed that the Golden Rule was the "entire Law -- all the rest is commentary"?

Some of you may remember an episode of the TV show "Twilight Zone" in which the Devil was being portrayed as having somehow been locked in a prison cell by a righteous monk. All that was necessary for the Devil to release himself was for him to persuade some ignorant person to remove a wooden staff which held the door closed.

The ignorant person appeared, and the Devil persuaded him. The Devil was released into the world, for evil. So much for TV.

In the "real" world, religion is the staff which keeps the Devil at his distance. Today, we are only inches away from a godless one-world Banking Dictatorship which will be pure Luciferian Hell. You cannot avoid this fate by murdering a few more Jews, since murder is what got you into this in the first place. You've got to correct yourself, because the collective wickedness of all mankind is what's causing this to happen. Correcting yourself is not nearly as difficult as you think, but there's very little time left.

Therefore, read these "Protocols" carefully, because your would-be jailers have done so before you. But don't be fooled into thinking that an organization which proposes to "annihilate religion" is a Jewish organization. If you spend your last few months of relative freedom gunning down poor and helpless Jews, as Hitler did (and remember, the rich of all religions always escape), that jail door will shut upon you, and there will be no opening it up within your lifetime, or within the lifetimes of your children or grandchildren -- if you have any.



19. But you yourselves perfectly well know that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, by want, so that the GOYIM see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.



Uncanny. As New World Order watchers all know, the AIDS virus was created as a germ warfare agent to destroy the "enemy", which turns out to be ourselves. There are now many examples of man-made disease which have been unleashed upon us, including but not limited to "AIDS", "Ebola", "Lyme Disease", and "Gulf War Syndrome". In some instances, such as in AIDS, the treatment is also deadly. AZT, which millions of people have been duped into taking, was known at the outset to be totally ineffectual. It is a fraudulent pseudo-treatment which, in the long run, is invariably fatal itself. AZT, like all drugs in its class, is carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic. It has no effect on AIDS, and never did.

That the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" forsaw this is almost unbelievable, and that it's happening is more unbelievable. But when the whole world forsakes God, then this and more must come to pass.

If I believed that all this evil could be stopped simply by murdering a few more Jews, I might even consent to it myself.



20. But if we give the nations of the world a breathing space the moment we long for is hardly likely ever to arrive.


Protocol No. 11

1. The State Council has been, as it were, the emphatic expression of the authority of the ruler: it will be, as the "show" part of the Legislative Corps, what may be called the editorial committee of the laws and decrees of the ruler.

2. This, then, is the programme of the new constitution. We shall make Law, Right and Justice (1) in the guise of proposals to the Legislative Corps, (2) by decrees of the president under the guise of general regulations, or orders of the Senate and of resolutions of the State Council in the guise of ministerial orders, (3) and in case a suitable occasion should arise--in the form of a revolution in the State.

3. Having established approximately the modus agendi we will occupy ourselves with details of those combinations by which we have still to complete the revolution in the course of the machinery of State in the direction already indicated. By these combinations I mean the freedom of the Press, the right of association, freedom of conscience, the voting principle, and many another that must disappear for ever from the memory of man, or undergo a radical alteration the day after the promulgation of the new constitution. It is only at that moment that we shall be able at once to announce all our orders, for, afterwards, every noticeable alteration will be dangerous, for the following reasons: if this alteration be brought in with harsh severity and in a sense of severity and limitations, it may lead to a feeling of despair caused by fear of new alterations in the same direction; if, on the other hand, it be brought in in a sense of further indulgences it will be said that we have recognised our own wrongdoing and this will destroy the prestige of the infallibility of our authority, or else it will be said that we have become alarmed and are compelled to show a yielding disposition, for which we shall get no thanks because it will be supposed to be compulsory....Both the one and the other are injurious to the prestige of the new constitution. What we want is that from the first moment of its promulgation, while the peoples of the world are still stunned by the accomplished fact of the revolution, still in a condition of terror and uncertainty, they should recognise once for all that we are so strong, so inexpugnable, so super-abundantly filled with power, that in no case shall we take any account of them, and so far from paying any attention to their opinions or wishes, we are ready and able to crush with irresistible power all expression or manifestation thereof at every moment and in every place, that we have seized at once everything we wanted and shall in no case divide our power with them....Then in fear and trembling they will close their eyes to everything, and be content to await what will be the end of it all.


4. The goyim are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock?...



Really, now. There are evil people in the world, but what wolf calls himself a "wolf"? When those whom the world would see as "wolves" write a manifesto, they refer to themselves as "deliverers", because that's how they see themselves.

Therefore, although "Protocols" contains much educational material, it remains a fraud.



5. There is another reason also why they will close their eyes: for we shall keep promising them to give back all the liberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamed all parties....

6. It is not worth while to say anything about how long a time they will be kept waiting for this return of their liberties....

7. For what purpose then have we invented this whole policy and insinuated it into the minds of the goy without giving them any chance to examine its underlying meaning? For what, indeed, if not in order to obtain in a roundabout way what is for our scattered tribe unattainable by the direct road? It is this which has served as the basis for our organisation of SECRET MASONRY WHICH IS NOT KNOWN TO, AND AIMS WHICH ARE NOT EVEN SO MUCH AS SUSPECTED BY, THESE GOY CATTLE, ATTRACTED BY US INTO THE "SHOW" ARMY OF MASONIC LODGES IN ORDER TO THROW DUST IN THE EYES OF THEIR FELLOWS.



Once again, we see the equating of "Jew" with "Mason". Those who monitor the "power elite" of the world are generally in agreement that Masonry is very much involved. But every town in the United States has a Masonic Lodge. Are we to believe that these are actually Jewish Synagogues?

On the other hand, this is consistent with the theory that Nilus tried to discredit Russian Freemasonry in the eyes of Nicholas and Alexandra, by linking it to Jews, whom everyone hates anyway.

The trouble with this is that it causes people to run after Jews while the New World Order people continue their work, undisturbed.



8. God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of the dispersion, and in this which appears in all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.

9. There now remains not much more for us to build up upon the foundation we have laid.



This is more antichrist hooey.

The Bible says that Israel went into Diaspora for sin, and with cause. If was not a gift!

And the Diaspora doesn't end with a satanic conquest of the world. It ends when the House of David rises up through the Golden Rule, which reads: "Love your neighbor", not "Kill him".

Furthermore, in the End Times, Israel will "look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son" (Zechariah 12:10). This can not happen if Israel rises up through a godless one-world Bank Dictatorship murder-and-rape machine.

Therefore, the author of "Protocols" is, in the final analysis, the Devil, who denies Bible prophecy, and who was a murderer from the beginning.



Protocol No. 12

1. The word "freedom," which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows:--

2. Freedom is the right to do that which the law allows. This interpretation of the word will at the proper time be of service to us, because all freedom will thus be in our hands, since the laws will abolish or create only that which is desirable for us according to the aforesaid programme.

3. We shall deal with the press in the following way: what is the part played by the press to-day? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of parties. It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves. We shall saddle and bridle it with a tight curb: we shall do the same also with all productions of the printing press, for where would be the sense of getting rid of the attacks of the press if we remain targets for pamphlets and books? The produce of publicity, which nowadays is a source of heavy expense owing to the necessity of censoring it, will be turned by us into a very lucrative source of income to our State: we shall lay on it a special stamp tax and require deposits of caution-money before permitting the establishment of any organ of the press or of printing offices; these will then have to guarantee our government against any kind of attack on the part of the press. For any attempt to attack us, if such still be possible, we shall inflict fines without mercy. Such measures as stamp tax, deposit of caution-money and fines secured by these deposits, will bring in a huge income to the government. It is true that party organs might not spare money for the sake of publicity, but these we shall shut up at the second attack upon us. No one shall with impunity lay a finger on the aureole of our government infallibility. The pretext for stopping any publication will be the alleged plea that it is agitating the public mind without occasion or justification. I beg you to note that among those making attacks upon us will also be organs established by us, but they will attack exclusively points that we have pre-determined to alter.



As far as the mass press is concerned, these things have already come to pass. It's too late to stop them. Is it "Jewish"? If one considers, for example, the New York Times, many anti-Semites call it the "Jew York Times", thinking that it is owned by Jews. The Sulzburger family may have Jewish roots, but there is abundant evidence that they are worshippers of the occult. They are anti-Semitic, anti-Christ, anti-Israel, and, even notwithstanding all this, I sincerely doubt that any of them have been in a synagogue recently.

But others have demonstrated that the New York Times was quietly acquired by the Rockefeller family 50 years ago. So is it "Jewish"? Oh, I almost forget. Because Rockefeller has money, he's a "Jew".

At the time of this writing, there is still a free press, but you have to seek it out. Forget your big-city daily papers, and forget about television entirely. You'll get nothing but lies.

There are still independent publishers, self-publishers, and small-circulation patriotic periodicals, all struggling to keep freedom of the press alive. There are also many uncensored radio stations, but most of them are on short wave only. And when I say "uncensored" I'm not talking about the likes of Rush Limbaugh, whose activities, entertaining though they surely are, nevertheless fit right in with the last sentence of Protocol 12:3 above.

Finally, there's the Internet, which is unregulated. The government is doing everything in its power to promote and publicize pornography and crime on the Internet, because they know that YOU will eventually demand that it be censored. On that day, the jail door shuts upon you. Don't be fooled. By all means, teach your children the truth about the fraud that pornography is, but don't let the government decide what goes into your eyes, ears, nose or throat -- especially the latter, because they'll slip you poison and kill you.

And now, back to our "story"...




4. Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

5. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the goy communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the coloured glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses: if already now there is not a single State where there exist for us any barriers to admittance into what goy stupidity calls State secrets: what will our position be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person our king of all the world....

6. Let us turn again to the future of the printing press. Every one desirous of being a publisher, librarian, or printer, will be obliged to provide himself with the diploma instituted therefor, which, in case of any fault, will be immediately impounded. With such measures the instrument of thought will become an educative means in the hands of our government, which will no longer allow the mass of the nation to be led astray in by-ways and fantasies about the blessings of progress. Is there any one of us who does not know that these phantom blessings are the direct roads to foolish imaginings which give birth to anarchical relations of men among themselves and towards authority, because progress, or rather the idea of progress, has introduced the conception of every kind of emancipation, but has failed to establish its limits....All the so-called liberals are anarchists, if not in fact, at any rate in thought. Every one of them is hunting after phantoms of freedom, and falling exclusively into license, that is, into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest...


7. We turn to the periodical press. We shall impose on it, as on all printed matter, stamp taxes per sheet and deposits of caution-money, and books of less than 30 sheets will pay double. We shall reckon them as pamphlets in order, on the one hand, to reduce the number of magazines, which are the worst form of printed poison, and, on the other, in order that this measure may force writers into such lengthy productions that they will be little read, especially as they will be costly. At the same time what we shall publish ourselves to influence mental development in the direction laid down for our profit will be cheap and will be read voraciously. The tax will bring vapid literary ambitions within bounds and the liability to penalties will make literary men dependent upon us. And if there should be any found who are desirous of writing against us, they will not find any person eager to print their productions. Before accepting any production for publication in print the publisher or printer will have to apply to the authorities for permission to do so. Thus we shall know beforehand of all tricks preparing against us and shall nullify them by getting ahead with explanations of the subject treated of.

8. Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralise the injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous influence upon the public mind....If we give permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and so on in the same proportion. This, however, must in nowise be suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bring over to us quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.

9. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.

10. In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid and indifferent.

11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.

12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions--aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical--for so long, of course, as the constitution exists....Like the Indian idol Vishnu they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. These fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will in fact follow the flag which we hang out for them.

13. In order to direct our newspaper militia in this sense we must take especial and minute care in organising this matter. Under the title of central department of the press we shall institute literary gatherings at which our agents will without attracting attention issue the orders and watchwords of the day. By discussing and controverting, but always superficially, without touching the essence of the matter, our organs will carry on a sham fight fusillade with the official newspapers solely for the purpose of giving occasion for us to express ourselves more fully than could well be done from the outset in official announcements, whenever, of course, that is to our advantage.

14. These attacks upon us will also serve another purpose, namely, that our subjects will be convinced of the existence of full freedom of speech and so give our agents an occasion to affirm that all organs which oppose us are empty babblers, since they are incapable of finding any substantial objections to our orders.


15. Methods of organisation like these, imperceptible to the public eye but absolutely sure, are the best calculated to succeed in bringing the attention and the confidence of the public to the side of our government. Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be required, to excite or to tranquillise the public mind on political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it....We shall have a sure triumph over our opponents since they will not have at their disposition organs of the press in which they can give full and final expression to their views owing to the aforementioned methods of dealing with the press. We shall not even need to refute them except very superficially.

16. Trial shots like these, fired by us in the third rank of our press, in case of need, will be energetically refuted by us in our semi-official organs.

17. Even nowadays, already, to take only the French press, there are forms which reveal masonic solidarity in acting on the watchword: all organs of the press are bound together by professional secrecy; like the augurs of old, not one of their numbers will give away the secret of his sources of information unless it be resolved to make announcement of them. Not one journalist will venture to betray this secret, for not one of them is ever admitted to practise literature unless his whole past has some disgraceful sore or other....These sores would be immediately revealed. So long as they remain the secret of a few the prestige of the journalist attacks the majority of the country -- the mob follow after him with enthusiasm.

18. Our calculations are especially extended to the provinces. It is indispensable for us to inflame there those hopes and impulses with which we could at any moment fall upon the capital, and we shall represent to the capitals that these expressions are the independent hopes and impulses of the provinces. Naturally, the source of them will be always one and the same--ours. What we need is that, until such time as we are in the plenitude power, the capitals should find themselves stifled by the provincial opinion of the nation, i.e., of a majority arranged by our agentur. What we need is that at the psychological moment the capitals should not be in a position to discuss an accomplished fact for the simple reason, if for no other, that it has been accepted by the public opinion of a majority in the provinces.

19. When we are in the period of the new regime transitional to that of our assumption of full sovereignty we must not admit any revelation by the press of any form of public dishonesty; it is necessary that the new regime should be thought to have so perfectly contended everybody that even criminality has disappeared....Cases of the manifestation of criminality should remain known only to their victims and to chance witnesses--no more.



Every day in America, the press is jam-packed with story after story of violence and crime; crime in the street, crime in the home, crime in the work place, and, especially, crime in the White House.

The occupant of the White House, all of whose friends and business partners are either dead or in jail, wants to take away your right to own a gun, so that only he and his fellow questionably elected and appointed government officials, will be armed. Why is it that I just can't accept that as being proper??

Meanwhile, when the press prints statistics about crime, it's invariably reported that crime is decreasing. This is reported every year. But turn to the next page of the newspaper, and what do you see? Crime.

Decide for yourself.



Protocol No. 13

1. The need for daily bread forces the goyim to keep silence and be our humble servants. Agents taken on to our press from among the goyim will at our orders discuss anything which it is inconvenient for us to issue directly in official documents, and we meanwhile, quietly amid the din of the discussion so raised, shall simply take and carry through such measures as we wish and then offer them to the public as an accomplished fact. No one will dare to demand the abrogation of a matter once settled, all the more so as it will be represented as an improvement....And immediately the press will distract the current of thought towards, new questions (have we not trained people always to be seeking something new?) Into the discussions of these new questions will throw themselves those of the brainless dispensers of fortunes who are not able even now to understand that they have not the remotest conception about the matters which they undertake to discuss. Questions of the political are unattainable for any save those who have guided it already for many ages, the creators.

2. From all this you will see that in securing the opinion of the mob we are only facilitating the working of our machinery, and you may remark that it is not for actions but for words issued by us on this or that question that we seem to seek approval. We are constantly making public declaration that we are guided in all our undertakings by the hope, joined to the conviction, that we are serving the common weal.


3. In order to distract people who may be too troublesome from discussions of questions of the political we are now putting forward what we allege to be new questions of the political, namely, questions of industry. In this sphere let them discuss themselves silly! The masses are agreed to remain inactive, to take a rest from what they suppose to be political (which we trained them to in order to use them as a means of combating the goy governments) only on condition of being found new employments, in which we are prescribing them something that looks like the same political object. In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about we further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people's palaces....Soon we shall begin through the press to propose competitions in art, in sport in all kinds: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more disaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begins to talk in the same tone as we, because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought....of course through such persons as will not be suspected of solidarity with us.

4. The part played by the liberals, utopian dreamers, will be finally played out when our government is acknowledged. Till such time they will continue to do us good service. Therefore we shall continue to direct their minds to all sorts of vain conceptions of fantastic theories, new and apparently progressive: for have we not with complete success turned the brainless heads of the goyim with progress, till there is not among the goyim one mind able to perceive that under this word lies a departure from truth in all cases where it is not a question of material inventions, for truth is one, and in it there is no place for progress. Progress, like a fallacious idea, serves to obscure truth so that none may know it except us, the Chosen of God, its guardians.

5. When we come into our kingdom our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it at the end under our beneficent rule.




The "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" has been around for a century in its current form -- and for an unknown period of time in its previous incarnations.

Contrary to what the lying author said in Protocol 13:6 above, millions and millions of people do know about it (although these are certainly in the minority -- millions more don't know about it.)

Though the percentage of people who know about "Protocols" is a minority, it is a substantial one. Yet the knowledge of millions and millions of people that there is a "power elite", dragging the world relentlessly toward godless dictatorship, and pulling every imaginable string under our very eyes, has done NOTHING to stop it!

Obviously the problem is much deeper than the author of "Protocols" imagined it to be. The problem goes to the heart of our own souls. Because we are greedy, we have raised up a government of thieves. Because we hate the truth, we have raised up a government of liars.

This problem cannot be solved by killing Jews or assassinating political leaders. It can only be solved by the thing which stiff-necked mankind has refused to do all along: accept the will of God, and do it. Exactly as written. And what is written is "Love thy neighbor as thyself".



Protocol No. 14

1. When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief. If this gives birth to the atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a warning for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of Moses, that, by its stable and thoroughly elaborated system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us. Therein we shall emphasize its mystical right, on which, as we shall say, all its educative power is based....Then at every possible opportunity we shall publish articles in which we shall make comparisons between our beneficent rule and those of past ages. The blessings of tranquillity, though it be a tranquillity forcibly brought about by centuries of agitation, will throw into higher relief the benefits to which we shall point. The errors of the goyim governments will be depicted by us in the most vivid hues. We shall implant such an abhorrence of them that the peoples will prefer tranquillity in a state of serfdom to those rights of vaunted freedom which have tortured humanity and exhausted the very sources of human existence, sources which have been exploited by a mob of rascally adventurers who know not what they do...Useless changes of forms of government to which we instigated the GOYIM when we were undermining their state structures, will have so wearied the peoples by that time that they will prefer to suffer anything under us rather than run the risk of enduring again all the agitations and miseries they have gone through.



This irretrievably accursed liar has forgotten a few things. In the first place, if the only religion remaining in their contrived "end times" is their brand of false "Judaism", and if everyone is of the same "Jewish church", then exactly whom shall they rule over?

Under such circumstances, only an hereditary "bloodline" would suffice to "justify" any one person or family "ruling" over (i.e., raping) any other, since everyone will be a phony "Jew", and a member of their lying church.

But, since it has been adequately demonstrated that white European Ashkenazi Jews are descended from converts**, and are not, to any important extent, direct descendents of Israel, then there will be no way to maintain the "purity" of any bloodline, since were never "pure" in the first place! Thus, if the nightmare "government" proposed in "Protocols" came to pass, the war would not end with the crowning of a phony-baloney "King Despot of the Blood of Zion" but would continue forever, as pretender-after-pretender struggled for control of the phony throne; a never-ending Shakespearean play of world-wide proportions.

This lying author has also forgotten -- or never knew -- that it was in the Jewish Bible that God foretold, through the mouths of His servants, that He would send a suffering servant into the world to die on behalf of our sins. I confess and proclaim at this time, in this place, and on this special occasion that this suffering servant is, was, and always will be Yeshua ben Yosef, whom the Greeks call Jesus Christ. This fact cannot be changed, altered, mutilated, adjusted, re-defined, obfuscated, or obliterated in any way whatsoever. It is carved in stone of the greatest hardness, and is untouchable by human instruments.

There is no Protocol which can ever be carried out which fails to take this overwhelming fact into account. "So let it be written" ... but it shall not be done!












Please see if you agree with me as you read the following section, entitled "WE SHALL FORBID CHRIST". The subject is never discussed! It's a title with nothing under it!



2. At the same time we shall not omit to emphasize the historical mistakes of the goy governments which have tormented humanity for so many centuries by their lack of understanding of everything that constitutes the true good of humanity in their chase after fantastic schemes of social blessings, and have never noticed that these schemes kept on producing a worse and never a better state of the universal relations which are the basis of human life....

3. The whole force of our principles and methods will lie in the fact that we shall present them and expound them as a splendid contrast to the dead and decomposed old order of things in social life.




Liar! The Jewish religion has no "secrets". Judaism is based, in its entirety, upon the Bible and the Talmud, both of which are available in print or CD ROM.

It has been suggested that older versions of the Talmud contained anti-Christian references. I have made a determined effort to locate copies of these documents, but in vain. Even the largest libraries of rare Jewish books contain no such old Talmuds, or even books which describe such old Talmuds. Nor have I succeeded in locating any Jewish scholars who know of any such books.

Judaism, like Christianity, Islam and Buddhism, is based upon revealed (not "secret") teachings which have all been recorded, and taught publicly for centuries. There is no secret or esoteric knowledge.

On the other hand, Devil worship, "mother earth" worship, and all other forms of occult "worship" are based ENTIRELY upon "secret teachings". These "secret teachings" are usually good for short-term material profits and brief sexual thrills, and then for long-term suffering and ultimate damnation.

So guess who is really behind "Protocols". Is it the "Jew"? Or the Devil? Decide for yourself, and bear the consequences.



5. In countries known as progressive and enlightened we have created a senseless, filthy, abominable literature. For some time after our entrance to power we shall continue to encourage its existence in order to provide a telling relief by contrast to the speeches, party programme, which will be distributed from exalted quarters of ours...Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the goyim, will compose speeches, projects, memoirs, articles, which will be used by us to influence the minds of the goyim, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us.


Protocol No. 15

1. When we at last definitely come into our kingdom by the aid of coups d'etat prepared everywhere for one and the same day, after the worthlessness of all existing forms of government has been definitely acknowledged (and not a little time will pass before that comes about, perhaps even a whole century) we shall make it our task to see that against us such things as plots shall no longer exist. With this purpose we shall slay without mercy all who take arms (in hand) to oppose our coming into our kingdom. Every kind of new institution of anything like a secret society will also be punished with death; those of them which are now in existence, are known to us, serve us and have served us, we shall disband and send into exile to continents far removed from Europe. In this way we shall proceed with those GOY masons who know too much; such of these as we may for some reason spare will be kept in constant fear of exile. We shall promulgate a law making all former members of secret societies liable to exile from Europe as the centre of our rule.



Who wants to live in Europe anyway?

That business about "coups d'etat prepared everywhere for one and the same day" reminds me of the satanic movie "Independence Day", which recently twisted the minds of young and old alike the world over.

Although Christian anti-Semites consider the producer of "Independence Day" to be a "Jew", the Mark of the Beast emblazoned in the sky at the end of another of Spielberg's movies, "Back to the Future Part II", suggests that he is one of Hollywood's most outspoken Satanic worshipper to date.

You can't be a worshipper of God and of Satan at the same time, no matter how much money you send to Israel.



2. Resolutions of our government will be final, without appeal.

3. In the goy societies, in which we have planted and deeply rooted discord and protestantism, the only possible way or restoring order is to employ merciless measures that prove the direct force of authority: no regard must be paid to the victims who fall, they suffer for the well-being of the future. The attainment of that well-being, even at the expense of sacrifices, is the duty of any kind of government that acknowledges as justification for its existence not only its privileges but its obligations. The principal guarantee of stability of rule is to confirm the aureole of power, and this aureole is attained only by such a majestic inflexibility of might as shall carry on its face the emblems of inviolability from mystical causes -- from the choice of God. Such was, until recent times, the Russian autocracy, the one and only serious foe we had in the world, without counting the Papacy. Bear in mind the example when Italy, drenched with blood, never touched a hair of the head of Sulla who had poured forth that blood: Sulla enjoyed an apotheosis for his might in the eyes of the people, though they had been torn in pieces by him, but his intrepid return to Italy ringed him round with inviolability. The people do not lay a finger on him who hypnotises them by his daring and strength of mind.



Well, well, well, at long-last we're getting somewhere!

Now, who do you suppose would write that the "choice of God" is "the Russian autocracy, the one and only serious foe we had in the world, without counting the Papacy"? A secret committee of 300 Jews? Or Sergyei Nilus, a Russian Catholic autocrat? Take a wild guess.

That part about Jews starting the reformation is a real knee-slapper. Now that's power! If you're not a Jew now, maybe you ought to convert!

On a more serious note, however, think: Who besides a Catholic would write that the Reformation was a Jewish plot?

This passage alone would make me discard the "Protocols" as a crude hoax, unworthy of even wasting time criticizing, except for one thing: The leaders of all the nations of the world have studied it, learned its methods, and are, right at this moment, applying them with great prejudice. Therefore, we must waste a little more time studying it as well.

May our Father in Heaven have mercy upon us, that we may soon reach a point where we no longer have to exhaust ourselves struggling with falsehood, but rather live simply in His truth.




4. Meantime, however, until we come into our kingdom, we shall act in the contrary way: we shall create and multiply free masonic lodges in all the countries of the world, absorb into them all who may become or who are prominent in public activity, for these lodges we shall find our principal intelligence office and means of influence. All these lodges we shall bring under one central administration, known to us alone and to all others absolutely unknown, which will be composed of our learned elders. The lodges will have their representatives who will serve to screen the above-mentioned administration of masonry and from whom will issue the watchword and programme. In these lodges we shall tie together the knot which binds together all revolutionary and liberal elements. Their composition will be made up of all strata of society. The most secret political plots will be known to us and fall under our guiding hands on the very day of their conception. Among the members of these lodges will be almost all the agents of international and national police since their service is for us irreplaceable in the respect that the police is in a position not only to use its own particular measures with the insubordinate, but also to screen our activities and provide pretexts for discontents, et cetera.



It's worth noting that America is overflowing with unconstitutional federal pseudo-laws. The federal government has gradually "trained" police in all 50 states to thoughtlessly enforce these pseudo-laws, without ever questioning them.

It's not that the police are "evil". Neither they nor their police chiefs know better, because no one tells them. No one, that is, except Christian patriots of rare dedication like Jack McLamb.**



5. The class of people who most willingly enter into secret societies are those who live by their wits, careerists, and in general people, mostly light-minded, with whom we shall have no difficulty in dealing and in using to wind up the mechanism of the machine devised by us. If this world grows agitated the meaning of that will be that we have had to stir up in order to break up its too great solidarity. But if there should arise in its midst a plot, then at the head of that plot will be no other than one of our most trusted servants. It is natural that we and no other should lead masonic activities, for we know whither we are leading, we know the final goal of every form of activity whereas the goyim have knowledge of nothing, not even of the immediate effect of action; they put before themselves, usually, the momentary reckoning of the satisfaction of their self-opinion in the accomplishment of their thought without even remarking that the very conception never belonged to their initiative but to our instigation of their thought....


6. The goyim enter the lodges out of curiosity or in the hope by their means to get a nibble at the public pie, and some of them in order to obtain a hearing before the public for their impracticable and groundless fantasies: they thirst for the emotion of success and applause, of which we are remarkably generous. And the reason why we give them this success is to make use of the high conceit of themselves to which it gives birth, for that insensibly disposes them to assimilate our suggestions without being on their guard against them in the fullness of their confidence that it is their own infallibility which is giving utterance to their own thoughts and that it is impossible for them to borrow those of others....You cannot imagine to what extent the wisest of the goyim can be brought to a state of unconscious naivete in the presence of this condition of high conceit of themselves, and at the same time how easy it is to take the heart out of them by the slightest ill-success, though it be nothing more than the stoppage of the applause they had, and to reduce them to a slavish submission for the sake of winning a renewal of success....By so much as ours disregard success if only they can carry through their plans, by so much the GOYIM are willing to sacrifice any plans only to have success. This psychology of theirs materially facilitates for us the task of setting them in the required direction. These tigers in appearance have the souls of sheep and the wind blows freely through their heads. We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of collectivism....They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality....

7. If we have been able to bring them to such a pitch of stupid blindness is it not a proof, and an amazingly clear proof, of the degree to which the mind of the goyim is undeveloped in comparison with our mind? This it is, which guarantees our success.


8. And how far-seeing were our learned elders in ancient times when they said that to attain a serious end it behooves not to stop at any means or to count the victims sacrificed for the sake of that end....We have not counted the victims of the seed of the goy cattle, though we have sacrificed many of our own, but for that we have now already given them such a position of the earth as they could not even have dreamed of. The comparatively small numbers of the victims from the number of ours have preserved our nationality from destruction.

9. Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves, to the founder of this affair. We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it, not even the victims themselves of our death sentence, they all die when required as if from a normal kind of illness....Knowing this, even the brotherhood in its turn dare not protest. By such methods we have plucked out of the midst of masonry the very root of protest against our disposition. While preaching liberalism to the goy we at the same time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioning submission.

10. Under our influence the execution of the laws of the goyim has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere. In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions, judges decide as we dictate to them, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the goyim, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have anything in common with them--by newspaper opinion or by other means....Even senators and the higher administration accept our counsels. The purely brute mind of the goyim is incapable of use for analysis and observation, and still more for the foreseeing whither a certain manner of setting a question may tend.

11. In this difference in capacity for thought between the goyim and ourselves may be clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the goyim. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them and do not invent (unless, perhaps, material things). From this it is plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world.


12. When comes the time of our overt rule, the time to manifest its blessings, we shall remake all legislatures, all our laws will be brief, plain, stable, without any kind of interpretations, so that anyone will be in a position to know them perfectly. The main feature which will run right through them is submission to orders, and this principle will be carried to a grandiose height. Every abuse will then disappear in consequence of the responsibility of all down to the lowest unit before the higher authority of the representative of power. Abuses of power subordinate to this last instance will be so mercilessly punished that none will be found anxious to try experiments with their own powers. We shall follow up jealously every action of the administration on which depends the smooth running of the machinery of the State, for slackness in this produces slackness everywhere; not a single case of illegality or abuse of power will be left without exemplary punishment.

13. Concealment of guilt, connivance between those in the service of the administration--all this kind of evil will disappear after the very first examples of severe punishment. The aureole of our power demands suitable, that is cruel, punishments for the slightest infringement, for the sake of gain, of its supreme prestige. The sufferer, though his punishment may exceed his fault, will count as a soldier falling on the administrative field of battle in the interest of authority, principle and law, which do not permit that any of those who hold the reins of the public coach should turn aside from the public highway to their own private paths. For examples our judges will know that whenever they feel disposed to plume themselves on foolish clemency they are violating the law of justice which is instituted for the exemplary edification of men by penalties for lapses and not for display of the spiritual qualities of the judge....Such qualities it is proper to show in private life, but not in a public square which is the educationary basis of human life.

14. Our legal staff will serve not beyond the age of 55, firstly because old men more obstinately hold to prejudiced opinions, and are less capable of submitting to new directions, and secondly because this will give us the possibility by this measure of securing elasticity in the changing of staff, which will thus the more easily bend under our pressure: he who wishes to keep his place will have to give blind obedience to deserve it. In general, our judges will be elected by us only from among those who thoroughly understand that the part they have to play is to punish and apply laws and not to dream about the manifestations of liberalism at the expense of the educationary scheme of the State, as the goyim in these days imagine it to be....This method of shuffling the staff will serve also to explode any collective solidarity of those in the same service and will bind all to the interests of the government upon which their fate will depend. The young generation of judges will be trained in certain views regarding the inadmissibility of any abuses that might disturb the established order of our subjects among themselves.

15. In these days the judges of the goyim create indulgences to every kind of crimes, not having a just understanding of their office, because the rulers of the present age in appointing judges to office take no care to inculcate in them a sense of duty and consciousness of the matter which is demanded of them. As a brute beast lets out its young in search of prey, so do the goyim give their subjects places of profit without thinking to make clear to them for what purpose such place was created. This is the reason why their governments are being ruined by their own forces through the acts of their own administration.



Sale of "indulgences" was a Catholic practice. No Jew would have written this.



16. Let us borrow from the example of the results of these actions yet another lesson for our government.

17. We shall root out liberalism from all the important strategic posts of our government on which depends the training of subordinates for our State structure. Such posts will fall exclusively to those who have been trained by us for administrative rule. To the possible objection that the retirement of old servants will cost the Treasury heavily, I reply, firstly, they will be provided with some private service in place of what they lose, and, secondly, I have to remark that all the money in the world will be concentrated in our hands, consequently it is not our government that has to fear expense.


18. Our absolutism will in all things be logically consecutive and therefore in each one of its decrees our supreme will will be respected and unquestionably fulfilled: it will ignore all murmurs, all discontents of every kind and will destroy to the root every kind of manifestation of them in act by punishment of an exemplary character.

19. We shall abolish the right of cassation, which will be transferred exclusively to our disposal--to the cognisance of him who rules, for we must not allow the conception among the people of a thought that there could be such a thing as a decision that is not right of judges set up by us. If, however, anything like this should occur, we shall ourselves cassate the decision, but inflict therewith such exemplary punishment on the judge for lack of understanding of his duty and the purpose of his appointment as well prevent a repetition of such cases....I repeat that it must be borne in mind that we shall know every step of our administration which only needs to be closely watched for the people to be content with us, for it has the right to demand from a good government a good official.

20. Our government will have the appearance of a patriarchal paternal guardianship on the part of our ruler. Our own nation and our subjects will discern in his person a father caring for their every need, their every act, their every inter-relation as subjects one with another, as well as their relations to the ruler. They will then be so thoroughly imbued with the thought that it is impossible for them to dispense with this wardship and guidance, if they wish to live in peace and quiet, that they will acknowledge the autocracy of our ruler with a devotion bordering on APOTHEOSIS, especially when they are convinced that those whom we set up do not put their own in place of authority, but only blindly execute his dictates. They will be rejoiced that we have regulated everything in their lives as is done by wise parents who desire to train their children in the cause of duty and submission. For the peoples of the world in regard to the secrets of our polity are ever through the ages only children under age, precisely as are also their governments.

21. As you see, I found our despotism on right and duty: the right to compel the execution of duty is the direct obligation of a government which is a father for its subjects. It has the right of the strong that it may use it for the benefit of directing humanity towards that order which is defined by nature, namely, submission. Everything in the world is in a state of submission, if not to man, then to circumstances of its own inner character, in all cases, to what is stronger. And so shall we be this something stronger for the sake of good.

22. We are obliged without hesitation to sacrifice individuals, who commit a breach of established order, for in the exemplary punishment of evil lies a great educational problem.

23. When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the world. The indispensable victims offered by him in consequence of their suitability will never reach the number of victims offered in the course of centuries by the mania of magnificance, the emulation between the goy governments.

24. Our King will be in constant communion with the peoples, making to them from the tribune speeches which fame will in that same hour distribute over all the world.



At about this point, this "Protocol" starts to become very tedious, and very annoying to transcribe. I am starting to resent this job, but I must continue.

There is a God in Heaven Who sees everything. Those who wrote "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" and those who have studied it because they think if a good way to "treat their neighbors as they hope and pray they shall never be treated themselves", have been, no doubt, highly amused by it. There amusement is about to come to an end.

If the judgment of the Lord does not rain down now, then there is no God, and I have not been called.

But there is a God, and I know of Him, and I testify that He shall with certainty execute his judgment upon every liar, thief and murderer who fails to turn around immediately. Many will not, and it is they who shall be punished, with the very punishment they wished for others.

"King of Israel"? The author of this ugly book, and any who subscribe to the theories it promulgates, will be Kings of Hell very shortly. The time has come.



Protocol No. 16

1. In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces except ours we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism--the universities, by re-educating them in a new direction. Their officials and professors will be prepared for their business by detailed secret programmes of action from which they will not with immunity diverge, not by one iota. They will be appointed with especial precaution, and will be so placed as to be wholly dependent upon the government.



It is already the case that the major universities in America function as private "think tanks", or, more properly, "plotting and scheming tanks" operating for the benefit of the monied elite. What is taught is what is "politically correct", and that is increasingly determined by the "government".

The cost of college education is so high, that only the richest can afford to send their children to college without financial aid. All financial aid is now linked to a federal application process. Even the "privilege" of the student working part-time in college requires the filing of a federal financial aid application.

Therefore, once again, it may be seen that "Protocols", however fraudulent it may be in part, is, from another point of view, being followed to the letter by this and other governments.



2. We shall exclude from the course of instruction State Law as also all that concerns that political question. These subjects will be taught to a few dozens of persons chosen for their preeminent capacities from among the number of the initiated. The universities must no longer send out from their halls milksops concocting plans for a constitution, like a comedy or a tragedy, busying themselves with questions of policy in which even their own fathers never had any power of thought.


4. Classicism, as also any form of study of ancient history, in which there are more bad than good examples, we shall replace with the study of the programme of the future. We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the government of the goyim. The study of practical life, of the obligations of order, of the relations of people one to another, of avoiding bad and selfish examples, which spread the infection of evil, and similar questions of an educative nature, will stand in the forefront of the teaching programme, which will be drawn up on a separate plan for each calling or state of life, in no wise generalising the teaching. This treatment of the question has special importance.

5. Each state of life must be trained within strict limits corresponding to its destination and work in life. The occasional genius has always managed and always will manage to slip through into other states of life, but it is the most perfect folly for the sake of this rare occasional genius to let through into ranks foreign to them the untalented who thus rob of their places who belong to those ranks by birth or employment. You know yourselves in what all this has ended for the goyim who allowed this crying absurdity.

6. In order that he who rules may be seated firmly in the hearts and minds of his subjects it is necessary for the time of his activity to instruct the whole nation in the schools and on the market places about his meaning and his acts and all his beneficent initiatives.

7. We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction. Learners of all ages have the right to assemble together with their parents in the educational establishments as it were in a club: during these assemblies, on holidays, teachers will read what will pass as free lectures on questions of human relations, of the laws of examples, of the limitations which are born of unconscious relations, and, finally, of the philosophy of new theories not yet declared to the world. These theories will be raised by us to the stage of a dogma of faith as a traditional stage towards our faith. On the completion of this exposition of our programme of action in the present and the future I will read you the principles of these theories.

8. In a word, knowing by the experience of many centuries that people live and are guided by ideas, that these ideas are imbibed by people only by the aid of education provided with equal success for all ages of growth, but of course by varying methods, we shall swallow up and confiscate to our own use the last scintilla of independence of thought, which we have for long past been directing towards subjects and ideas useful for us. The system of bridling thought is already at work in the so-called system of teaching by object lessons, the purpose of which is to turn the goyim into unthinking submissive brutes waiting for things to be presented before their eyes in order to form an idea of them....In France, one of our best agents, Bourgeois, has already made public a new programme of teaching by object lessons.


Protocol No. 17

1. The practice of advocacy produces men cold, cruel, persistent, unprincipled, who in all cases take up an impersonal, purely legal standpoint. They have the inveterate habit to refer everything to its value for the defence and not to the public welfare of its results. They do not usually decline to undertake any defence whatever, they strive for an acquittal at all costs, cavilling over every petty crux of jurisprudence and thereby they demoralise justice. For this reason we shall set this profession into narrow frames which will keep it inside this sphere of executive public service. Advocates, equally with judges, will be deprived of the right of communication with litigants; they will receive business only from the court and will study it by notes of report and documents, defending their clients after they have been interrogated in court on facts that have appeared. They will receive an honorarium without regard to the quality of the defence. This will render them mere reporters of law-business in the interests of justice and as counterpoise to the proctor who will be the reporter in the interests of prosecution; this will shorten business before the courts. In this way will be established a practice of honest unprejudiced defence conducted not from personal interest but by conviction. This will also, by the way, remove the present practice of corrupt bargain between advocates to agree only to let that side win which pays most....



Can we believe our eyes? This actually sounds like a good idea!

This is the turning point of the "Protocols", where the tone changes from obsessive anti-Semitism to a discussion of real social change. The change proposed here has obviously not been thought through, but is thrown out thoughtlessly by one who has presumably been defrauded by lying attorneys on more than one occasion, and who therefore wishes to restrain them.

However, the author himself is a supreme liar, and I, for one, would investigate a hundred proposals for legal reform from honest men before considering a single proposal from a confirmed liar.

Nevertheless, let's give credit where credit is due. The author has spoken for legal reform, and in present day America the need, if anything, is even greater than it was back then.




2. We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. Freedom of conscience had been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.



More baloney. No Jew will ever "wreck" the Christian religion, because the belief in a Suffering Servant of God arose from a straightforward interpretation of the Jewish scriptures, and the Jewish interpretation of these scriptures -- whereby we deny the Suffering Servant to this day -- has always been far-fetched by way of comparison to the Christian interpretation.

The relationships of the other religions to Judaism is more subtle, but those relationships can be seen and comprehended if they are sought. I sought, and found them. The LORD has charged that I show them to you. That is, in fact, one of the primary purposes of the Ark of Salvation Web Site.



3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place.



Since the Catholic Church was founded entirely by Jews, it seems most unlikely that any "invisible hands" are going to touch it in any way.

As far as hatred of the Catholic Church is concerned, no one hates the Catholics more than the Protestants, many of whom are still foaming at the mouth with venomous hatred to this day, as if they themselves had been alive in the days of Luther, and as if they themselves had been tortured and murdered by the Inquisitors whom the Church appointed to quell all dissent and rebellion.

These are the Protestants who call Catholics "Papists". They're found all over the world.

Therefore, if, perchance, anyone harms the Christian Church in any of its forms, my guess will be that the worst enemy of the Christian Church will prove to be the Church itself, and not any "invisible hand" of Jews.




4. The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the patriarch of the international Church.



The King of the Jews 2000 years ago was Yeshua ben Yosef (this is Jesus' real name), who was murdered by the descendents of the likes of Korah and his gang of Mixed-Multitude Golden-Calf-Worshipping riff raff, with the complete cooperation of Rome, and in full accordance with scripture.

Also in full accordance with scripture, when the Son of Man returns to the world, he will, on this next occasion, execute the LORD's justice. Anyone who wants to hang him up is more than welcome to try, but don't forget the words of Shakespeare: "hoist on his own petard". Give it your best shot.



5. But, in the meantime, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, we shall not overtly lay a finger on existing churches, but we shall fight against them by criticism calculated to produce schism...

6. In general, then, our contemporary press will continue to convict State Affairs, religions, incapacities of the goyim, always using the most unprincipled expressions in order by every means to lower their prestige in the manner which can only be practised by the genius of our gifted tribe....

7. Our kingdom will be an apologia of the divinity Vishnu, in whom is found its personification -- in our hundred hands will be, one in each, the springs of the machinery of social life. We shall see everything without the aid of official police which, in that scope of its rights which we elaborated for the use of the goyim, hinders governments from seeing. In our programme one-third of our subjects will keep the rest under observation from a sense of duty, on the principle of volunteer service to the State. It will then be no disgrace to be a spy and informer, but a merit: unfounded denunciations, however, will be cruelly punished that there may be development of abuses of this right.

8. Our agents will be taken from the higher as well as the lower ranks of society, from among the administrative class who spend their time in amusements, editors, printers and publishers, booksellers, clerks, and salesmen, workmen, coachmen, lackeys, et cetera. This body, having no rights and not being empowered to take any action on their own account, and consequently a police without any power, will only witness and report: verification of their reports and arrests will depend upon a responsible group of controllers of police affairs, while the actual act of arrest will be performed by the gendarmerie and the municipal police. Any person not denouncing anything seen or heard concerning questions of polity will also be charged with and made responsible for concealment, if it be proved that he is guilty of this crime.



Hitler, who claimed to have read "Protocols" and intended to kill all the Jews, used all the above methods, starting with his own colleagues. No one -- not Jew, not Christian, and not even atheist -- was safe from the constant threat of "denunciation" by his next-door neighbor. It was profitable to bear false witness. It got you a promotion.




9. Just as nowadays our brethren are obliged at their own risk to denounce to the kabal apostates of their own family or members who have been noticed doing anything in opposition to the kabal, so in our kingdom over all the world it will be obligatory for all our subjects to observe the duty of service to the State in this direction.

10. Such an organisation will extirpate abuses of authority, of force, of bribery, everything in fact which we by our counsels, by our theories of the superhuman rights of man, have introduced into the customs of the goyim....But how else were we to procure that increase of causes predisposing to disorders in the midst of their administration?....Among the number of those methods one of the most important is -- agents for the restoration of order, so placed as to have the opportunity in their disintegrating activity of developing and displaying their evil inclinations -- obstinate self-conceit, irresponsible exercise of authority, and, first and foremost, venality.


Protocol No. 18


1. When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defence (the most fatal poison for the prestige of authority) we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the co-operation of good speakers. Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterances. This will give us the pretext for domiciliary prerequisitions and surveillance on the part of our servants from among the number of the goyim police....

2. As the majority of conspirators act out of love for the game, for the sake of talking, so, until they commit some overt act we shall not lay a finger on them but only introduce into their midst observation elements....It must be remembered that the prestige of authority is lessened if it frequently discovers conspiracies against itself: this implies a presumption of consciousness of weakness, or, what is still worse, of injustice. You are aware that we have broken the prestige of the goy kings by frequent attempts upon their lives through our agents, blind sheep of our flock, who are easily moved by a few liberal phrases to crimes provided only they be painted in political colours. We have compelled the rulers to acknowledge their weakness in advertising overt measures of secret defence and thereby we shall bring the promise of authority to destruction.

3. Our ruler will be secretly protected only by the most insignificant guard, because we shall not admit so much as a thought that there could exist against him any sedition with which he is not strong enough to contend and is compelled to hide from it.

4. If we should admit this thought, as the goyim have done and are doing, we should ipso facto be signing a death sentence, if not for our ruler, at any rate for his dynasty, at no distant date.


5. According to strictly enforced outward appearances our ruler will employ his power only for the advantage of the nation and in no wise for his own or dynastic profits. Therefore, with the observance of this decorum, his authority will be respected and guarded by the subjects themselves, it will receive an apotheosis in the admission that with it is bound up the well-being of every citizen of the State, for upon it will depend all order in the common life of the pack....

6. Overt defence of the kind argues weakness in the organisation of his strength.

7. Our ruler will always among the people be surrounded by a mob of apparently curious men and women, who will occupy the front ranks about him, to all appearance by chance, and will restrain the ranks of the rest out of respect as it will appear for good order. This will sow an example of restraint also in others. If a petitioner appears among the people trying to hand a petition and forcing his way through the ranks, the first ranks must receive the petition and before the eyes of the petitioner pass it to the ruler, so that all may know that what is handed in reaches its destination, that, consequently, there exists a control of the ruler himself. The aureole of power requires for its existence that the people may be able to say: "If the king knew of this," or: "the king will hear it."

8. With the establishment of official defence the mystical prestige of authority disappears: given a certain audacity, and everyone counts himself master of it, the sedition-monger is conscious of his strength, and when occasion serves watches for the moment to make an attempt upon authority.... For the goyim we have been preaching something else, but by that very fact we are enabled to see what measures of overt defence have brought them to....

9. Criminals with us will be arrested at the first more or less well-grounded suspicion; it cannot be allowed that out of fear of a possible mistake an opportunity should be given of escape to persons suspected of a political lapse of crime, for in these matters we shall be literally merciless. If it is still possible, by stretching a point, to admit a reconsideration of the motive causes in simple crimes, there is no possibility of excuse for persons occupying themselves with questions in which nobody except the government can understand anything....And it is not all governments that understand true policy.



This constant blabbering about "no mercy" again rules out any chance of a Jewish origin of "Protocols". God proclaims Himself to be merciful and forgiving to all who humble themselves before Him. This He states in the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Qur'an. If we are created in His image, then justice and mercy must be built into our souls.

Those who delight in mercilessness and injustice are of the devil.



Protocol No. 19

1. If we do not permit any independent dabbling in the political we shall on the other hand encourage every kind of report or petition with proposals for the government to examine into all kinds of projects for the amelioration of the condition of the people; this will reveal to us the defects or else the fantasies of our subjects, to which we shall respond either by accomplishing them or by a wise rebutment to prove the shortsightedness of one who judges wrongly.

2. Sedition-mongering is nothing more than the yapping of a lap-dog at an elephant. For a government will organised, not from the police but from the public point of view, the lap-dog yaps at the elephant in entire unconsciousness of its strength and importance. It needs no more than to take a good example to show the relative importance of both and the lap-dogs will cease to yap and will wag their tails the moment they set eyes on an elephant.

3. In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse in its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.

4. We have done our best, and I hope we have succeeded, to obtain that the goyim should not arrive at this means of contending with sedition. It was for this reason that through the Press and in speeches, indirectly--in cleverly compiled school-books on history, we have advertised the martyrdom alleged to have been accredited by sedition-mongers for the idea of the commonweal. This advertisement has increased the contingent of liberals and has brought thousands of goyim into the ranks of our livestock cattle.

Protocol No. 20

1. To-day we shall touch upon the financial programme, which I put off to the end of my report as being the most difficult, the crowning and the decisive point of our plans. Before entering upon it I will remind you that I have already spoken before by way of a hint when I said that the sum total of our actions is settled by the question of figures.

2. When we come into our kingdom our autocratic government will avoid, from a principle of self-preservation, sensibly burdening the masses of the people with taxes, remembering that it plays the part of father and protector. But as State organisation costs dear it is necessary nevertheless to obtain the funds required for it. It will, therefore, elaborate with particular precaution the question of equilibrium in this matter.

3. Our rule, in which the king will enjoy the legal fiction that everything in his State belongs to him (which may easily be translated into fact), will be enabled to resort to the lawful confiscation of all sums of every kind for the regulation of their circulation in the State. From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property. In this manner the dues will be paid without straitening or ruining anybody in the form of a percentage of the amount of property. The rich must be aware that it is their duty to place a part of their superfluities at the disposal of the State since the State guarantees them security of possession of the rest of their property and the right of honest gains, I say honest, for the control over property will do away with robbery on a legal basis.

4. This social reform must come from above, for the time is ripe for it -- it is indispensable as a pledge of peace.


5. The tax upon the poor man is a seed of revolution and works to the detriment of the State which in hunting after the trifling is missing the big. Quite apart from this, a tax on capitalists diminishes the growth of wealth in private hands in which we have in these days concentrated it as a counterpoise to the government strength of the goyim--their State finances.

6. A tax increasing in a percentage ratio to capital will give much larger revenue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the goyim.



This is, in effect, the "graduated income tax", which was instituted in America by Woodrow Wilson, the same year (1913) he turned his back on the Constitution to allow the formation of the Federal Reserve Bank. There are many conservatives who regard Wilson as having committed treason against the Constitution.

The graduated income tax was proposed in the nineteenth century by the enemy of God, Karl Marx, in Das Kapital. Its purpose was twofold:

    1. obviously, to raise money, but more importantly
    2. to make it exceedingly difficult, or even impossible for a poor person to rise up through the ranks of money to join the upper class.

As every salaried person knows, in our tax system a pay increase is usually absorbed almost completely by increased tax. The higher salary puts you in a higher tax bracket. The result is that the government gets a lot more money; you get only a little.

In the United States, the only reason anyone ever rises up through the ranks of poverty to wealth is because that person evaded his "fair share" of income tax.



7. The force upon which our king will rest consists in the equilibrium and the guarantee of peace, for the sake of which things it is indispensable that the capitalists should yield up a portion of their incomes for the sake of the secure working of the machinery of the State. State needs must be paid by those who will not feel the burden and have enough to take from.

8. Such a measure will destroy the hatred of the poor man for the rich, in whom he will see a necessary financial support for the State, will see in him the organiser of peace and well-being since he will see that it is the rich man who is paying the necessary means to attain these things.

9. In order that payers of the educated classes should not too much distress themselves over the new payments they will have full accounts given them of the destination of those payments, with the exception of such sums as will be appropriated for the needs of the throne and the administrative institutions.

10. He who reigns will not have any properties of his own once all in the State represented his patrimony, or else the one would be in contradiction to the other; the fact of holding private means would destroy the right of property in the common possessions of all.

11. Relatives of him who reigns, his heirs excepted, who will be maintained by the resources of the State, must enter the ranks of servants of the State or must work to obtain the right to property; the privilege of royal blood must not serve for the spoiling of the treasury.

12. Purchase, receipt of money or inheritance will be subject to the payment of a stamp progressive tax. Any transfer of property, whether money or other, without evidence of payment of this tax which will be strictly registered by names, will render the former holder liable to pay interest on the tax from the moment of transfer of these sums up to the discovery of his evasion of declaration of the transfer. Transfer documents must be presented weekly at the local treasury office with notifications of the name, surname and permanent place of residence of the former and the new holder of the property. This transfer with register of names must begin from a definite sum which exceeds the ordinary expenses of buying and selling necessaries, and these will be subject to payment only by a stamp impost of a definite percentage of the unit.

13. Just strike an estimate of how many times such taxes as these will cover the revenue of the goyim States.


14. The State exchequer will have to maintain a definite complement of reserve sums, and all that is collected above that complement must be returned into circulation. On these sums will be organised public works. The initiative in works of this kind, proceeding from State sources, will blind the working class firmly to the interests of the State and to those who reign. From these same sums also a part will be set aside as rewards of inventiveness and productiveness.

15. On no account should so much as a single unit above the definite and freely estimated sums be retained in the State treasuries, for money exists to be circulated and any kind of stagnation of money acts ruinously on the running of the State machinery, for which it is the lubricant; a stagnation of the lubricant may stop the regular working of the mechanism.

16. The substitution of interest-bearing paper for a part of the token of exchange has produced exactly this stagnation. The consequences of this circumstance are already sufficiently noticeable.



This is a direct criticism of the British financial "system", where real money is replaced by "fiat" money; printed from plain paper by super-rich private userers and "loaned" to the country at interest. Under a British-style system, a tiny monied elite will inevitably wind up owning everything, and an ever-enlarging lower class will end up in perpetual debt.

Of course, in a country like Czarist Russia, where the peasants were utterly without hope anyway, what difference would it have made?



17. A court of account will also be instituted by us, and in it the ruler will find at any moment a full accounting for the State income and expenditure, with the exception of the current monthly account, not yet made up, and that of the preceding month, which will not yet have been delivered.

18. The one and only person who will have no interest in robbing the State is its owner, the ruler. This is why his personal control will remove the possibility of leakages of extravagances.

19. The representative function of the ruler at receptions for the sake of etiquette, which absorbs so much invaluable time, will be abolished in order that the ruler may have time for control and consideration. His power will not then be split up into fractional parts among time-serving favourites who surround the throne for its pomp and splendour, and are interested only in their own and not in the common interests of the State.

20. Economic crises have been produced by us for the goyim by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge capitals have stagnated, withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same stagnant capitals for loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of these capitals....The concentration of industry in the hands of capitalists out of the hands of small masters has drained away all the juices of the peoples and with them also the States....



The economic "crises" and "burdens" spoken of here existed in America until 1833, when Andrew Jackson courageously thrust out the Second Bank of the United States. The country was prosperous and relatively debt-free until 1913, when Woodrow Wilson foolishly (and, some would say, "treasonously") allowed the Federal Reserve Bank to conquer the country. The national debt can never be paid off now, and our freedom is dead. It cannot be brought back.

See the Table of Contents for more discussion of money.



21. The present issue of money in general does not correspond with the requirements per head, and cannot therefore satisfy all the needs of the workers. The issue of money ought to correspond with the growth of population and thereby children also must absolutely be reckoned as consumers of currency from the day of their birth. The revision of issue is a material question for the whole world.

22. You are aware that the gold standard has been the ruin of the States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so that we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible.



Satisfy whose "demands for money"?

The truth is that the world bankers who are clever enough, and relentless enough, to deceive their respective nations into accepting their fiat paper as "money", inevitably wind up with all that nation's gold.

In this country, virtually all the gold which ever circulated as currency is now in the basement of the Federal Reserve Bank. Note I said "Federal Reserve Bank" and not "Fort Knox". There's very little gold left in Fort Knox.

Sure, the currency has been "expanded", but the "expanded" currency is inflated, meaning you can't buy much with it. What cost a nickel in George Washington's day cost only 5-10 cents when my father was a kid. Now the same item costs $1.50. So who benefited from this "expansion"? Only the bankers who printed the money.

To learn what the Federal Court said when it was asked to tell us who owns all that gold and silver in the basement of the Federal Reserve Bank, click here**.




23. With us the standard that must be introduced is the cost of working-man power, whether it be reckoned in paper or in wood. We shall make the issue of money in accordance with the normal requirements of each subject, adding to the quantity with every birth and subtracting with every death.

24. The accounts will be managed by each department (the French administrative division), each circle.

25. In order that there may be no delays in the paying out of money for State needs the sums and terms of such payments will be fixed by decree of the ruler; this will do away with the protection by a ministry of one institution to the detriment of others.

26. The budgets of income and expenditure will be carried out side by side that they may not be obscured by distance on to another.

27. The reforms projected by us in the financial institutions and principles of the goyim will be clothed by us in such forms as will alarm nobody. We shall point out the necessity of reforms in consequence of the disorderly darkness into which the goyim by their irregularities have plunged the finances. The first irregularity, as we shall point out, consists in their beginning with drawing up a single budget which year after year grows owing to the following cause: this budget is dragged out to half the year, then they demand a budget to put things right, and this they expend in three months, after which they ask for a supplementary budget, and all this ends with a liquidation budget. But, as the budget of the following year is drawn up in accordance with the sum of the total addition, the annual departure from the normal reaches as much as 50 per cent in a year, and so the annual budget is trebled in ten years. Thanks to such methods, allowed by the carelessness of the goy States, their treasuries are empty. The period of loans supervenes, and that has swallowed up remainders and brought all the goy States to bankruptcy.

28. You understand perfectly that economic arrangements of this kind, which have been suggested to the goyim by us, cannot be carried on by us.


29. Every kind of loan proves infirmity in the State and a want of understanding of the rights of the State. Loans hang like a sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers, who, instead of taking from their subjects by a temporary tax, come begging with outstretched palm of our bankers. Foreign loans are leeches which there is no possibility of removing from the body of the State until they fall off of themselves or the State flings them off. But the goy States do not tear them off; they go on in persisting in putting more on to themselves so that they must inevitably perish, drained by voluntary blood-letting.



Although this was written a century ago, it precisely describes the condition of America today. Our "National Debt", consisting of an imaginary loan of printed paper money -- money which came out of no one's pocket -- is so large that it cannot be admitted to.

The Federal Reserve Bankers themselves are afraid to talk of it, or acknowledge it. After all, the only thing they ever wanted was the interest. But the mere existence of the principal is dangerous, because its nature and origin are supposed to be secret, and millions of people now know.

So the government Office of Management and Budget (OMB), taking its orders from the bank as usual, now publishes figures which are totally make-believe. According to economists, the early 1990's were the target years in which the annual interest on the National Debt grew larger than the entire yearly income of the United States of America! So what did the OMB report? Did they report the truth, namely that the nation is financially ruined? Did they admit that we are bankrupt?

Hardly. All of a sudden, in those years, OMB reports began to show that America was awash in money! Talk about "The Emperor's New Clothes"!

The newspapers dutifully failed to report a single word of truth concerning this matter. They are, after all, owned by banks now.

The man they call "President", Mr. Clinton, not content merely to acquiesce to totally fabricated OMB statistics, had the incredible chuzpah to announce this year that there was a multi-billion dollar surplus! The public in general, ever-ready to believe good news, bought it. The newspapers were essentially silent about the shameless lie.





30. What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is -- an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty--treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.

31. From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is bailing out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealthy foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.



Another reference to the British -- and lately to the American -- banking system.



32. So long as loans were internal the goyim only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere all the wealth of States flowed into our cash-boxes and all the goyim began to pay us the tribute of subjects.

33. If the superficiality of goy kings on their thrones in regard to State affairs and the venality of ministers or the want of understanding of financial matters on the part of other ruling persons have made their countries debtors to our treasuries to amounts quite impossible to pay it has not been accomplished without, on our part, heavy expenditure of trouble and money.

34. Stagnation of money will not be allowed by us and therefore there will be no State interest-bearing paper, except a one-per cent series, so that there will be no payment of interest to leeches that suck all the strength out of the estate. The right to issue interest-bearing paper will be given exclusively to industrial companies who will find no difficulty in paying interest out of profits, whereas the State does not make interest on borrowed money like these companies, for the State borrows to spend and not to use in operations.

35. Industrial papers will be bought also by the government which from being as now a paper of tribute by loan operations will be transformed into a lender of money at a profit. This measure will stop the stagnation of money, parasitic profits and idleness, all of which were useful for us among the goyim so long as they were independent but are not desirable under our rule.

36. How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the goyim, as expressed in the fact that they have been borrowing from us with payment of interest without ever thinking that all the same these very moneys plus an addition for payment of interest must be got by them from their own State pockets in order to settle up with us. What could have been simpler than to take the money they wanted from their own people?

37. But it is a proof of the genius of our chosen mind that we have contrived to present the matter of loans to them in such a light that they have even seen in them an advantage for themselves.

38. Our accounts, which we shall present when the time comes, in the light of centuries of experience gained by experiments made by us on the goy States, will be distinguished by clearness and definiteness and will show at a glance to all men the advantage of our innovations. They will put an end to those abuses to which we owe our mastery over the goyim, but which cannot be allowed in our kingdom.

39. We shall so hedge about our system of accounting that neither the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant will be in a position to divert even the smallest sum from its destination without detection or to direct it in another direction except that which will be once fixed in a definite plan of action.

40. And without a definite plan it is impossible to rule. Marching along an undetermined road and with undetermined resources brings to ruin by the way heroes and demi-gods.

41. The goy rulers, whom we once upon a time advised should be distracted from State occupations by representative receptions, observances of etiquette, entertainments, were only screens for our rule. The accounts of favourite courtiers who replaced them in the sphere of affairs were drawn up for them by our agents, and every time gave satisfaction to short-sighted minds by promises that in the future economies and improvements were foreseen....Economies from what? From new taxes?--were questions that might have been but were not asked by those who read our accounts and projects.

42. You know to what they have been brought by this carelessness, to what a pitch of financial disorder they have arrived, notwithstanding the astonishing industry of their peoples....


Protocol No. 21




The following "protocols" are, to me, borderline-incomprehensible. Perhaps you can figure out what they mean.

The author was apparently an amateur economist, and has a program of some sort. This program, it seems to me, is being put forth quite seriously, albeit in this ridiculous setting.




1. To what I reported to you at the last meeting I shall now add a detailed explanation of internal loans. Of foreign loans I shall say nothing more, because they have fed us with national moneys of the goyim, but for our State there will be no foreigners, that is, nothing external.

2. We have taken advantage of the venality of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over, by lending the goy governments moneys which were not at all needed by the States. Could anyone do the like in regard to us?....Therefore, I shall only deal with the details of internal loans.

3. States announce that such a loan is to be concluded and open subscriptions for their own bills of exchange, that is, for their interest-bearing paper. That they may be within the reach of all the price is determined at from a hundred to a thousand; and a discount is made for the earliest subscribers. Next day by artificial means the price of them goes up, the alleged reason being that everyone is rushing to buy them. In a few days the treasury safes are as they say overflowing and there's more money than they can do with (why then take it?). The subscription , it is alleged, covers many times over the issue total of the loan; in this lies the whole stage effect--look you, they say, what confidence is shown in the government's bills of exchange.

4. But when the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, but only the interest on it. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit....

5. Later comes the time for conversions, but they diminish the payment of interest without covering the debt, and besides they cannot be made without the consent of the lenders; on announcing a conversion a proposal is made to return the money to those who are not willing to convert their paper. If everybody expressed his unwillingness and demanded his money back, the government would be hooked on their own files and would be found insolvent and unable to pay the proposed sums. By good luck the subjects of the goy governments, knowing nothing about financial affairs, have always preferred losses on exchange and diminution of interest to the risk of new investments of their moneys, and have thereby many a time enabled those governments to throw off their shoulders a debit of several millions.

6. Nowadays, with external loans, these tricks cannot be played by the goyim for they know that we shall demand all our moneys back.

7. In this way an acknowledged bankruptcy will best prove to the various countries the absence of any means between the interests of the peoples and of those who rule them.

8. I beg you to concentrate your particular attention upon this point and upon the following: nowadays all internal loans are consolidated by so-called flying loans, that is, such as have terms of payment more or less near. These debts consist of moneys paid into the savings banks and reserve funds. If left for long at the disposition of a government these funds evaporate in the payment of interest on foreign loans, and are placed by the deposit of equivalent amounts of rentes.

9. And these last it is which patch up all the leaks in the State treasuries of the goyim.

10. When we ascend the throne of the world all these financial and similar shifts, as being not in accord with our interests, will be swept away so as not to leave a trace, as also will be destroyed all money markets, since we shall not allow the prestige of our power to be shaken by fluctuations of prices set upon our values, which we shall announce by law at the price which represents their full worth without any possibility of lowering or raising. (Raising givers the pretext for lowering, which indeed was where we made a beginning in relation to the values of the goyim.).

11. We shall replace the money markets by grandiose government credit institutions, the object of which will be to fix the price of industrial values in accordance with government views. These institutions will be in a position to fling upon the market five hundred millions of industrial paper in one day, or to buy up for the same amount. In this way all industrial undertakings will come in to dependence upon us. You may imagine for yourselves what immense power we shall thereby secure for ourselves....


Protocol No. 22


1. In all that has so far been reported by me to you, I have endeavoured to depict with care the secret of what is coming, of what is past, and of what is going on now, rushing into the flood of the great events coming already in the near future, the secret of our relations to the goyim and of financial operations. On this subject there remains still a little for me to add.

2. In our hands is the greatest power of our day--gold: in two days we can procure from our storehouses any quantity we may please.

3. Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true well-being--the bringing of everything into order? Though it be even by the exercise of some violence, yet all the same it will be established. We shall contrive to prove that we are benefactors who have restored to the rent and mangled earth the true good and also freedom of the person, and therewith we shall enable it to be enjoyed in peace and quite, with proper dignity of relations, on the condition, of course, of strict observance of the laws established by us. We shall make plain therewith that freedom does not consist in dissipation and in the right of unbridled licence any more than the dignity and force of a man do not consist in the right of everyone to promulgate destructive principles in the nature of freedom of conscience, equality and a like, that freedom of the person is no wise consists in the right to agitate oneself and others by abominable speeches before disorderly mobs, and that true freedom consists in the inviolability of the person who honourably and strictly observes all the laws of life in common, that human dignity is wrapped up in consciousness of the rights and also of the absence of rights of each and not wholly and solely in fantastic imaginings about the subject of one's ego.



Not so fast! That gold is the "great power", there can be no argument. People -- all people -- love gold, and people have demonstrated conclusively in every age that they will unhesitatingly kill for it.

But that's about to change. Trust me, it's about to change.

Now, however, this business about "all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit" is more Sergyei Nilus hooey. It suggests that everything bad ever done was done by Jews; ignoring entirely all the evils done by the Assyrians, Babylonians, Romans, Greeks, Vikings, Mongols, Nazis and Communists. Were the Assyrians -- nasty parasites who sucked the lives out the communities they conquered, and who skinned their conquered victims alive, hanging hundreds of them on walls, still alive and twitching, while their conquerors had lunch -- were these "Jews"? Nilus would probably say "yes", because The Russians of his day were evidently easily led.

How about Antiochus Epiphanes, the Syrian-Greek would-be Emperor of the World? He was in the habit of cutting out his "enemy's" tongues, scalping them, castrating them, and then roasting what was left of them in huge frying pans, while he had lunch. A Jew?

If anyone messed with Genghis Khan, he would send an army to their city and cut up anything breathing -- men, women, children, dogs, etc. Then the city would be burned down and the remains piled up into a large heap. Jew? I don't think so.

Worse of all is the lie about how "our rule is predestined by God". The Bible does not prophecy that Jews, in the usual sense of the world, will "rule" over anybody. What the Bible prophecies is that the Law of God -- which has ALREADY permeated into every nation under the name of each nation's own religion -- will finally be written on all hearts.

God's victory comes NOT when a Buddhist becomes a "Jew", but when a Buddhist becomes a Buddhist. NOT when a Muslim bows to the Old Testament, but when a Muslim bows to the Qur'an, his own testament. Do you think that's already happened? I'm not so sure. Perhaps you ought to read the Qur'an, and find out what it really says, before you take the New York Times' word for it.



4. Our authority will be glorious because it will be all-powerful, will rule and guide, and not muddle along after leaders and orators shrieking themselves hoarse with senseless words which they call great principles and which are nothing else, to speak honestly, but utopian....Our authority will be the crown of order, and in that is included the whole happiness of man. The aureole of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee before it and a reverent fear before it of all the peoples. True force makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God: none dare come near to it so as to take so much as a span from it away.



WAIT A MINUTE! Are they better than God?!!

This line establishes, beyond all shadow of a doubt, that this "protocol" is of the Devil. It describes a gang of idiots who think that because they have palmed some gold, they have become more powerful than God.

Think carefully now. WHO do you know who says God is unimportant, but Gold is "god"?

The fingerprints of he who has deceived mankind -- quite successfully I might add -- since he first slithered up to us as a snake in the grass -- these fingerprints are all over this book.

If you do what Hitler did, which is to presume that you're somehow "clean", and that the trouble in the world is because of "the Jews", and you use your last few remaining days of freedom to go on a wild bloodbath against your "enemies", that prison door of Satan will shut upon you.

After it does, there will be no opening it. Think very carefully.




Protocol No. 23

1. That the peoples may become accustomed to obedience it is necessary to inculcate lessons of humility and therefore to reduce the production of articles of luxury. By this we shall improve morals which have been debased by emulation in the sphere of luxury.




"Improve morals"? "Humility"? Practice what you preach.



We shall re-establish small master production which will mean laying a mine under the private capital of manufacturers. This is indispensable also for the reason that manufacturers on the grand scale often move, though not always consciously, the thoughts of the masses in directions against the government. A people of small masters knows nothing of unemployment and this binds him closely with existing order, and consequently with the firmness of authority. Unemployment is a most perilous thing for a government. For us its part will have been played out the moment authority is transferred into our hands. Drunkenness also will be prohibited by law and punishable as a crime against humanness of man who is turned into a brute under the influence of alcohol.




Time after time in "Protocols...", we read of oppressive things which, almost miraculously, have come to pass in the real world, or are about to.

In America today, there is a vicious anti-alcohol movement once again. We seem to have forgotten Prohibition, a wretched failure.

The trouble is, of course, that in America today there's no law. Everyone does whatever the Hell he wants to do, and the worse the crime, the less chance there is of successfully prosecuting it. How can it be otherwise? The very worst of the criminals have put themselves into power in this country, and nothing but crime will "trickle down" from them.

If a drunk driver kills someone, that's murder. The trouble in this country is not that drunk drivers aren't punished, it's that murder isn't punished. Removing alcohol will not help.

Alcohol can never be successfully banned in any God-fearing nation. Not now. Not ever.

Why? Because Jesus poured a glass of wine for each of his disciples and said "this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins" (Matthew 26:28).

In the Gospel of Luke Jesus instructs his disciples to repeat this ceremony, which the Catholic Church calls Communion, after his death, "in remembrance of me" (Luke 22:19).

So how, in a Christian nation, shall alcohol be banned? Or is it that this is not a Christian nation? If so, what is it?




2. Subjects, I repeat once more, give blind obedience only to the strong hand which is absolutely independent of them, for in it they feel the sword of defence and support against social scourges....What do they want with an angelic spirit in a king? What they have to see in him is the personification of force and power.

3. The supreme lord who will replace all now existing rulers, dragging on their existence among societies demoralised by us, societies that have denied even the authority of God, from whose midst breaks out on all sides the fire of anarchy, must first of all proceed to quench this all-devouring flame. Therefore he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies, though he should drench then with his own blood, that he may resurrect them again in the form of regularly organised troops fighting consciously with every kind of infection that may cover the body of the State with sores.

4. This Chosen One of God is chosen from above to demolish the senseless forces moved by instinct and not reason, by brutishness and humanness. These forces now triumph in manifestations of robbery and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and rights. They have overthrown all forms of social order to erect on the ruins of the throne of the King of the Jews; but their part will be played out the moment he enters into his kingdom. Then it will be necessary to sweep them away from his path, on which must be left no knot, no splinter.

5. Then will it be possible for us to say to the peoples of the world: Give thanks to God and bow the knee before him who bears on his front the seal of the predestination of man, to which God himself has led his star that none other but Him might free us from all the before-mentioned forces and evils.




We just saw, in the commentary on Protocol No. 22, that these people employ "true force", which "makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God".

So, they are BIGGER than whoever it is they are calling "god".

So who is this "god" that they keep blubbering about? Not the God of the Bible, that's for sure.




Protocol No. 24

1. I pass now to the method of confirming that dynastic roots of Kind David to the last strata of the earth.

2. This confirmation will first and foremost be included in that in which to this day has rested the force of conservatism by our learned elders of the conduct of the affairs of the world, in the directing of the education of thought of all humanity.

3. Certain members of the seed of David will prepare the kings and their heirs, selecting not by the right of heritage but by eminent capacities, inducting them into the most secret mysteries of the political, into schemes of government, but providing always that none may come to knowledge of the secrets. The object of this mode of action is that all may know that government cannot be entrusted to those who have not been inducted into the secret places of its art....




This "seed of David" stuff is nonsense. In another part of this Web Site, you will see exactly and literally what have become of the "seed of David", which everyone church to call "his own".

I'll give you a clue: The "seed of David" has spread far and wide, and is now everywhere. A "Messiah" of the "seed of David" can now arise anywhere, from the tropical rain forests on the equator to the frozen tundras above the Arctic Circle. He can be of any race, because there is no longer any race on earth which has not received the seed of David and spread it to all its citizens.

You don't believe it? It's simple mathematics, based on a consideration of genes. But that subject is dealt with elsewhere**.




4. To these persons only will be taught the practical application of the aforenamed plans by comparison of the experiences of many centuries, all the observations of the politico-economic moves and social sciences -- in a word, all the spirit of laws which have been unshakably established by nature herself for the regulation of the relations of humanity.

5. Direct heirs will often be set aside from ascending the throne if in their time of training they exhibit frivolity, softness and other qualities that are the ruin of authority, which render them incapable of governing and in themselves dangerous for kingly office.

6. Only those who are unconditionally capable for firm, even if it be to cruelty, direct rule will receive the reins of rule from our learned elders.

7. In case of falling sick with weakness of will or other form of incapacity, kings must by law hand over the reins of rule to new and capable hands.

8. The king's plan of action for the current moment, and all the more so for the future, will be unknown, even to those who are called his closest counsellors.


9. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming.

10. In the person of the king who with unbending will is master of himself and of humanity all will discern as it were fate with its mysterious ways. None will know what the king wishes to attain by his dispositions, and therefore none will dare to stand across an unknown path.

11. It is understood that the brain reservoir of the king must correspond in capacity to the plan of government it has to contain. It is for this reason that he will ascend the throne not otherwise than after examination of his mind by the aforesaid learned elders.

12. That the people may know and love their king it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures that necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.

13. This terror was indispensable for us till the time comes for both these forces separately to fall under our influence.

14. The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts to the worst and most brutal side of human activity.

15. The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations.

16. Our supreme lord must be of an exemplary irreproachability.




Well, this is the biggest joke of all. We learn here that this "king" will be appointed by the "learned elders", who will train him, test him, select him, and -- if deemed proper in their eyes alone -- remove him!

If these "learned elders" have power over the king, then exactly what sort of "king" is he?

The word "king" implies absolute sovereignty, but this "king" answers to a committee of 300 "Jews" -- or so we are being told. We may conclude that, if this committee of 300 "Jews" really exists, that they are already in charge, they always were in charge, and they always will be in charge.

So what's all this blubbering about a "king"? They're already the "king" themselves, and they obviously have no intention of sharing their power with anyone but a powerless figurehead.

If this committee of 300 "Jews" really exists, and if they really already control newspapers, tv, radio, schools, governments, banks, and armies, why don't they just go ahead and appoint their idiot-king figurehead right now, and get this all over with?

Answer: because there's no such committee, and even if it existed, its power would be only in its imagination.

Having said all this, be assured that there are many, many people in the world who believe in their own self-importance. Some of them call themselves "Jews", but are they really? Have they read Torah?

Some of them call themselves "Christians". Who do they serve, however? Christ? Or money?

The forces of world elitism are indeed poised on the verge of one-world banking dictatorship. They are selling this idea to you with sex, drugs, mindless entertainment, and false promises of "peace". The power is with you to agree or disagree.

They say all religions are outdated. Watch out! That's the Devil talking. He's been successfully peddling that line for 6,000 years.

But this time, things have changed. The world is becoming one world, and its government will be one government. Choose it carefully. And make sure God is in it, because if He isn't, you might as well be dead.































The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea by Tim Cohen. March 1998, Prophecy House, Inc., PO Box 461104, Aurora CO 80046-1104, USA. Or visit them on the Web at









"...the world is governed by very different personages to what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes..."


The above words, a quote from the fictional novel Coningsby by Benjamin Disraeli, were probably more responsible for World War II than any other single cause.

Although most people who have heard of Benjamin Disraeli, the nineteenth century English Prime Minister, think of him as a Jew, the fact remains that he was a Baptized Christian. Since King Henry VIII, the Anglican Church has reigned supreme in Britain, and Disraeli's father, supposedly following a quarrel with his synagogue in 1813, decided to have his children raised as Christians. Since the family evidently had political ambitions, and since Jews in Britain, until 1958, were excluded from Parliament, these conversions must be held to have been highly suspect.

The comments which Benjamin Disraeli made in Coningsby, which we shall review shortly, reveal that he retained a profound identification with the Jewish religion throughout his life. For a person such as Disraeli to persist in the outward veneer of "Christianity", for political gain, reveals a fundamentally dishonest aspect of character. For that reason alone, his comments about Jews ought not to have been taken too seriously. But they were, and with extremely deleterious long-term effects.

To make matters worse, the comments I refer to were made long before Disraeli became Prime Minister, and were made, therefore, not in a speech in Parliament, or in any other location. In fact, they were not made in a speech at all. They were made in a novel. A work of fiction.

That novel, Coningsby, was published in 1844, 24 years before Disraeli became Prime Minister. Its two major characters were Coningsby himself, a politically ambitious man whom commentators regard as a thinly-veiled fictional representation of Disraeli, and Sidonia, an even more thinly-veiled representation of Mayer Rothschild.

In this novel, Disraeli expressed his theories about Jewish genealogy and racial purity. Through the vehicle of the fictional character Sidonia, Disraeli made the following gravely erroneous remark:


"Sidonia was well aware that in the five great varieties in which physiology has divided the human species; to wit, the Caucasian, the Mongolian, the Malayan, the American, the Ethiopian; the Arabian tribes rank in the first and superior class, together, among others, with the Saxon and the Greek... But Sidonia and his brethren could claim a distinction which the Saxon and the Greek, and the rest of the Caucasian nations, have forfeited. THE HEBREW IS AN UNMIXED RACE*. Doubtless among the tribes who inhabit the bosom of the desert, progenitors alike of the Mosaic and the Mohammedan Arabs, blood may be found as pure as that of the descendants of the Scheik Abraham. But the Mosaic Arabs are the most ancient, if not the only, unmixed blood that dwells in cities.
An unmixed race of a first-rate organisation are the aristocracy of Nature. Such excellence is a positive fact; not an imagination, a ceremony, coined by poets..."
*(Emphasis added)

It will surely not have escaped your attention that if you simply replace the word "Hebrew" in the above quote with "German", you have Mein Kampf. Is it not extraordinary how a casual, egotistical, self-serving comment about your own race can be twisted around into a death sentence against it?

Those of you who actually believe that Jews are a "pure race" will be astounded by what you will see in other parts of this Web site (see Table of Contents). For now, suffice it to say that passages such as the above, written a hundred years before Hitler, show clearly that racial false science did not originate in Nazi Germany, but was alive and well a century earlier in the mind of Benjamin Disraeli, an English Prime Minister of Jewish descent.

This nonsense about Jews being racially "pure" would probably not have been of any further historical consequence if not for another comment by the fictional character, Sidonia, made later in the book:

"You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews: that mysterious Russian diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organised and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and which will be in fact a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolise the professorial chairs of Germany...
"...A few years back we were applied to (i.e., for a loan) by Russia. Now there has been no friendship between the Court of St. Petersburg and my family... However circumstances drew to an approximation between the Romanoffs and the Sidonias. I resolved to go myself to St. Petersburg. I had on my arrival an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count Cancrin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew. The loan was connected with the affairs of Spain; I resolved on repairing to Spain from Russia... I had an audience immediately on my arrival with the Spanish minister, Senor Mendizabel; I beheld one like myself, the son of a Nuovo Christiano, a Jew of Arragon. In consequence of what transpired at Madrid, I went straight to Paris to consult the President of the French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew, a hero, an imperial marshal, and very properly so, for who should be military heroes if not those who worship the Lord of Hosts?"
(Coningsby): "And is Soult a Hebrew!"
(Sidonia): "Yes, and others of the French marshals, and the most famous; Massena, for example; his real name was Manasseh: but to my anecdote. The consequence of our consultations was that some northern power should be applied to in a friendly and mediative capacity. We fixed on Prussia, and the President of the Council made an application to the Prussian minister, who attended a few days after our conference. Count Arnim entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages to what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

So "Marsden" was right about Disraeli, but the question is, was Disraeli right about himself?

I know from my own childhood that Jews tend to mix only with other Jews. This process can be entirely unconscious. In my own case, I was sent to schools which were almost exclusively Jewish. Even when I was in college, where Jews were distinctly in the minority, I was still subconsciously limiting my associations almost exclusively to other Jewish students. It was not until my adult years, when I traveled across America, that I discovered the Christian world. It was then that I first visited communities where there was not a single Jew, and where people maintained the oddest notions about what a Jew was (including, but not limited to the idea that Jews have horns). It was not until that point that it finally dawned upon me that I had spent my entire childhood in a sheltered environment.

We may assume that Disraeli met with Jews wherever he traveled, and that his own personal experiences formed the basis for the above quote from Coningsby. But what does it really mean? Not only do I believe that Jews unconsciously (or consciously) seek other Jews for company, I also believe that no real Christian was fooled by the elder Disraeli's "conversion". And back then, no proper Christian gentlemen wanted to associate unnecessarily with Jews. Therefore, I have concluded that it is probable that whenever Disraeli had occasion to visit with foreign government leaders, they would say "the Jew is coming; send out our Jewish minister to meet him".

I, for one, therefore regard Benjamin Disraeli as a conceited fool. However, because he was rich, and because he rose to political power, his word has often been taken as being "gospel" truth. You'll have to decide for yourself.